What a ridiculous platform to take - taking issue with people having the right to defend property. The between the lines here is "it doesn't matter if they're destroying property if violence is the only way they can be stopped then we shouldn't stop them."
Hoppe has some strong opinions on people who don't recognize property rights:
A member of the human race who is completely incapable of understanding the higher productivity of labor performed under a division of labor based on private property is not properly speaking a person (a persona), but falls instead in the same moral category as an animal-of either the harmless sort (to be domesticated and employed as a producer or consumer good, or to be enjoyed as a "free good") or the wild and dangerous one (to be fought as a pest). On the other hand, there are members of the human species who are capable of understanding the insight but who lack the moral strength to act accordingly. Such persons are either harmless "brutes living outside of and separated from human society, or they are more or less dangerous criminals. They are persons who knowingly act wrongly and who besides having to be tamed or even physically defeated must also be punished in proportion to the severity of their crime to make them understand the nature of their wrongdoings and hopefully to teach them a lesson for the future. Human cooperation (society) can only prevail and advance as long as man is capable of subduing, taming, appropriating, and cultivating his physical and animalistic surroundings, and as long as he succeeds in suppressing crime, reducing it to a rarity by means of self-defense, property protection, and punishment.
What a ridiculous platform to take - taking issue with people having the right to defend property. The between the lines here is "it doesn't matter if they're destroying property if violence is the only way they can be stopped then we shouldn't stop them."
Hoppe has some strong opinions on people who don't recognize property rights: