It'd only take about a $1 gas tax to pay for removing CO2 from cars directly from the air, and most of that cost is energy, which could be cheap and clean from nuclear (if we stopped with the nimby crap).
So this is a totally possible solution, but IPCC doesn't even look into it or model the cost or anything. Machines added the CO2, but mechanical removal is completely ignored as a solution. Same with geoengineering, which climate doomers say is "too risky" while saying it's the end times unless we completely overhaul all of industry.
IPCC report is not written by rational people, it's a report by a political thinktank pretending to be science.
For me it's the politics.
It'd only take about a $1 gas tax to pay for removing CO2 from cars directly from the air, and most of that cost is energy, which could be cheap and clean from nuclear (if we stopped with the nimby crap).
So this is a totally possible solution, but IPCC doesn't even look into it or model the cost or anything. Machines added the CO2, but mechanical removal is completely ignored as a solution. Same with geoengineering, which climate doomers say is "too risky" while saying it's the end times unless we completely overhaul all of industry.
IPCC report is not written by rational people, it's a report by a political thinktank pretending to be science.