Yes, he was absolutely negligent. He wasn't following gun safety rules, which would have avoided most of this. At the very least if he followed proper procedure there would have been some.sort of.protection for the direction he was firing in.
Why why was he firing the gun? Were they shooting at the time, or rehearsing? Did he check the gun? Was he handling correctly at all times? Trigger discipline?
Not to mention that he's a producer on the film, which will make him part of the eventual wrongful death suit anyway.
Stop talking out of your ass about things you know nothing about.
Negligence against the people that were shot? Seems fairly clear.
The set armorer and Baldwin himself. The armorer for not clearing the weapon, Baldwin for treating it like a toy and shooting two people.
Tell that to the dead woman.
...
Yes, he was absolutely negligent. He wasn't following gun safety rules, which would have avoided most of this. At the very least if he followed proper procedure there would have been some.sort of.protection for the direction he was firing in.
Why why was he firing the gun? Were they shooting at the time, or rehearsing? Did he check the gun? Was he handling correctly at all times? Trigger discipline?
Not to mention that he's a producer on the film, which will make him part of the eventual wrongful death suit anyway.
Stop talking out of your ass about things you know nothing about.