I think you're also ignoring that as a (nominal) federation, the US has states with virtually no restrictions and what anti-restrictions they can put in place against non-government entities. So many states here are going to be more free than the UK, and won't have the political will for more restrictions in the future (which almost certainly exists in the UK.)
Ah, well, I'd imagine my comment is still accurate, even if I confused the governmental subdivisions of the UK (England doesn't have it's own, separate parliament, does it? It's directly under the UK parliament as I understand it.)
(England doesn't have it's own, separate parliament, does it? It's directly under the UK parliament as I understand it.)
Indeed, it doesn't. Which is a bit of a problem, because it means the Welsh, Scottish, and Northern Irish voters get more of say on England than England gets on any of them when it comes to internal matters.
I think you're also ignoring that as a (nominal) federation, the US has states with virtually no restrictions and what anti-restrictions they can put in place against non-government entities. So many states here are going to be more free than the UK, and won't have the political will for more restrictions in the future (which almost certainly exists in the UK.)
I specifically said England.
Scotland and Wales have mandatory 'Vaccine passport' requirements, put in place by their own regional governments.
Ah, well, I'd imagine my comment is still accurate, even if I confused the governmental subdivisions of the UK (England doesn't have it's own, separate parliament, does it? It's directly under the UK parliament as I understand it.)
Indeed, it doesn't. Which is a bit of a problem, because it means the Welsh, Scottish, and Northern Irish voters get more of say on England than England gets on any of them when it comes to internal matters.