Why the fuck would you want to forfeit the ability to bypass women entirely in 2021? Do you realize how headache free it is to hook up and be together as men?
There's a lot in your comment I disagree with, but this made me laugh out loud, because you do make a really good point here. Kudos.
Of course it is a lie, because there are many "white male christians" that are openly gay and right wing, I know many of them.
Okay, this got me to laugh out loud again, too, because I started thinking about the Right-wing fundamentalists hooking up with Nancy Boys in truck stops to share a little oral "salvation" to the unwashed masses while preaching how awful it is, only to get caught out and smeared in the media for their extracurricular physical "studies".
It WAS, the movement was created by gay men that just wanted the right to fuck whoever they wanted and that's it. When it went from GLB to LGBT is when it stopped being a legitimate movement for equal rights and began turning into the segregating propaganda machine that is today.
No, no, no, no, no. This is where you're clearly wrong here. Go back and re-read what really got the whole LGBT propaganda movement started, it was formulated as a subversive psyop called "The Gay Agenda" (literally) by Dr. Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen.
The whole "We just want to screw!" mantra was and still is bullcrap. Gay men were screwing plenty throughout the 70s and no one cared. You don't need rights, promotion, propaganda, marketing, or an entire sociopolitical swell to screw someone in private. It should have been private and stayed private.
The whole point of making it public was to subvert the conscious perception of the homosexual lifestyle to make it seem "normal" and "okay" among the general population, which is exactly what Dr. Kirk and Madsen wanted to achieve.
Stop being so naive, they don't give a fuck about heteros nor gays, they only want to keep people fighting over petty shit. Their endgame is erasing all the "normalization" of gays lesbians and bisexuals over the past decades in the west. It's just another way of dividing people.
Just the opposite, it's to normalize it to the point where it's the standard. It's why you have articles now calling heterosexuality a "compulsory" social construct:
And it has everything to do with hetero-conversion, even as admitted to by the people that are being inundated with the Rainbow Reich propaganda. Heck they are even ADMITTING to being converted:
The article literally reaffirms everything I've mentioned in past posts. She admits it herself, the algorithm kept feeding her lesbian content, she eventually gave in and tried it out after Big Tech peer pressure. That is literally propaganda used for hetero-conversion, and she isn't the only one.
There are A LOT of stories like that one where confused teens/20-somethings get roped in and start experimenting due to social pressure.
Nowadays it's "being X is what defines literally everything about me, kids need to be put on hormone blockers, heteros bad", which is the complete opposite of "we just want to not be defined by our sexual preferences", the entire reason the movement was even created.
You're right that the trans movement is all about breaching access to little kids. Child transgenderism is literally the gateway to legalizing pedophilia, which is the real end goal for that endeavor.
However, you're wrong about the intentions of the movement. It was always designed as an infiltration mechanic to proselytize socially degenerative behaviour.
As I mentioned, if it was really all about just screwing people in private, they could have done it in private and left the rest of the general public alone, but that was never the goal. It was never about what they did in private, else it would have stayed private.
Destabilizing American population rates + breaching politics to eventually legalize pedophilia.
They've been playing the looooong game for a long time (ever since the faux dissolution of NAMBLA), attacking the target from multiple vectors and for multiple purposes.
It's a disruption mechanic to chip away at the foundational bedrocks of society. What's one of the ways a society stays healthy and strong? A moral/stable nuclear family unit.
So fewer and fewer younger people are identifying as straight. How do you think that's going to affect the already sky-high divorce rates that basically leave men emotionally and financially crippled? If you don't know how that racket operates, a female divorce lawyer actually lays out the stats how fatherless homes has ruined many a child:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlSwsE22nX0
But circling back to the whole alphabet soup crisis, they're closer then they've ever been to legalizing pedophilia. This is going to come through the whole child trans movement, which is why they've been pushing so much for the trans angle lately, and promoting it so heavily in schools.
So if you follow the basic logic of everything that the alphabet mafia is doing it goes something like this:
Disrupted family unit -> easily impressionable child -> globohomo propaganda in media/school -> child groomed to join alphabet soup spectrum -> pedo bait.
The only thing they need to do now (and I expect this within the next decade or so) is to start legalizing a way for children to consent if they're under 18.
Same guy diff account for one last reply because I'm just a lurker.
You might be right that the political movement was corrupted from the start, but there was a legitimate reason to push for equal rights that just didn't exist (like same sex marriage). Now I'm of the opinion that once such rights have been acquired, political movements outlive their usefulness and are just prone to corruption and become puppets for the political powers or corpos that take over, so yes, the LGBT movement is perverted trash that is only good for promoting hate, segregation and outright vile insanity like destroying children's bodies. If you think you despise them, imagine what you would feel if these imbeciles spoke for you and considered you "their own" because you happen to like penis/vagina.
As for the endgame being "hetero conversion" I still don't agree. If trying to erase straight people (this is a conceptually silly idea that literally can't biologically happen) is a way to create tension and make people fight, then yes, because that's what I believe is the true endgame. I suppose it could be one more of their tactics to radicalize the discourse to force a backlash from normies who wouldn't care otherwise, like the trans kids or the non-binary thing.
but there was a legitimate reason to push for equal rights that just didn't exist (like same sex marriage).
Except there was no reason for same sex marriage to exist, since marriage is supposed to be a holy matrimony between man and woman. If they wanted civil unions, they could have them. Even then, same sex marriage was designed as a way to pervert a heterosexual institution with zero gain for the homosexual couples since homosexuals cannot procreate with one another, thus rendering holy matrimony void.
If you think you despise them, imagine what you would feel if these imbeciles spoke for you and considered you "their own" because you happen to like penis/vagina.
There were enough gays, lesbians, etc., to speak up and say that the organizations didn't speak for them, but that almost NEVER happened. There was no counter-movement, and now everybody in the alphabet soup parade is saying "B-b-but we're not that radical, we're not like them!" well, too little, too late, and too bad.
The tolerance for most people has worn thin, just like with BLM. If they wanted to kneel and cry about police brutality that's one thing, but then burning and looting and rioting turned it into a literal domestic terrorist organization, and now some of them are saying "B-b-but that's not what it was about!", well they should have done more to control the message, because trying to play the "woe is me" shtick no longer works when people have died, homes have been lost, businesses burned to the ground, and cities destroyed.
In the case of the whole Rainbow Reich movement, those kids who have undergone hormone treatment, those men who castrated themselves, those women who cut off their breasts, and every other poor sap who experimented in a lifestyle that took them down a deep, dark path of no return, can't just shrug their shoulders and get their lives back.
These social engineering movements have PERMANENTLY ruined lives, and all for ZERO benefit to society as a whole.
As for the endgame being "hetero conversion" I still don't agree. If trying to erase straight people (this is a conceptually silly idea that literally can't biologically happen) is a way to create tension and make people fight, then yes,
It doesn't matter if you believe it or not, it's already happened:
Notice how all of those stories are treated? If a man left his wife to be with a young, hot secretary, all of those stories would have called it infidelity and the man a "pig", but because media promotes homosexual infidelity, it's paraded around as "Okay", and hetero-conversion is seen as "living your truth".
You can ignore the facts all you want and keep believing whatever you want, but it doesn't change reality.
Couple the media's insistence of grooming people into the alphabet lifestyle as early as pre-school, and the fact that the vaccines can cause infertility/pregnancy issues --
--And you can easily see how the multiple attack vectors of destabilizing the nuclear family, grooming children, and attempting to cut off the biological consistency of heterosexual couples is no joke.
There's a lot in your comment I disagree with, but this made me laugh out loud, because you do make a really good point here. Kudos.
Okay, this got me to laugh out loud again, too, because I started thinking about the Right-wing fundamentalists hooking up with Nancy Boys in truck stops to share a little oral "salvation" to the unwashed masses while preaching how awful it is, only to get caught out and smeared in the media for their extracurricular physical "studies".
No, no, no, no, no. This is where you're clearly wrong here. Go back and re-read what really got the whole LGBT propaganda movement started, it was formulated as a subversive psyop called "The Gay Agenda" (literally) by Dr. Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen.
It's discussed on page 28 here: https://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/08a/born_gay_hoax/TheBornGayHoax.pdf
The whole "We just want to screw!" mantra was and still is bullcrap. Gay men were screwing plenty throughout the 70s and no one cared. You don't need rights, promotion, propaganda, marketing, or an entire sociopolitical swell to screw someone in private. It should have been private and stayed private.
The whole point of making it public was to subvert the conscious perception of the homosexual lifestyle to make it seem "normal" and "okay" among the general population, which is exactly what Dr. Kirk and Madsen wanted to achieve.
Just the opposite, it's to normalize it to the point where it's the standard. It's why you have articles now calling heterosexuality a "compulsory" social construct:
https://theconversation.com/feminisms-legacy-sees-college-women-embracing-more-diverse-sexuality-159023
https://www.chicagotribune.com/redeye/ct-redeye-ask-anna-am-i-lesbian-or-bisexual-questioning-sexuality-0606-story.html
https://www.epw.in/journal/2019/9/commentary/compulsory-heterosexuality-gender-and.html
It's why you have the media repeatedly trying to goad men and women to experiment across the alphabet soup spectrum:
https://www.out.com/lifestyle/2018/10/17/10-reasons-every-gay-man-should-try-throuple-once
https://www.esquire.com/uk/life/sex-relationships/news/a11943/a-guide-to-pegging/
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/more-women-experimenting-bisexuality-flna1c9440713
And it has everything to do with hetero-conversion, even as admitted to by the people that are being inundated with the Rainbow Reich propaganda. Heck they are even ADMITTING to being converted:
https://www.thecut.com/2021/08/tiktok-helped-me-come-out-gay-lesbian.html
The article literally reaffirms everything I've mentioned in past posts. She admits it herself, the algorithm kept feeding her lesbian content, she eventually gave in and tried it out after Big Tech peer pressure. That is literally propaganda used for hetero-conversion, and she isn't the only one.
There are A LOT of stories like that one where confused teens/20-somethings get roped in and start experimenting due to social pressure.
You're right that the trans movement is all about breaching access to little kids. Child transgenderism is literally the gateway to legalizing pedophilia, which is the real end goal for that endeavor.
However, you're wrong about the intentions of the movement. It was always designed as an infiltration mechanic to proselytize socially degenerative behaviour.
As I mentioned, if it was really all about just screwing people in private, they could have done it in private and left the rest of the general public alone, but that was never the goal. It was never about what they did in private, else it would have stayed private.
Why? What's the endgame?
Destabilizing American population rates + breaching politics to eventually legalize pedophilia.
They've been playing the looooong game for a long time (ever since the faux dissolution of NAMBLA), attacking the target from multiple vectors and for multiple purposes.
It's a disruption mechanic to chip away at the foundational bedrocks of society. What's one of the ways a society stays healthy and strong? A moral/stable nuclear family unit.
If you can disrupt the nuclear family, pit the husband against wife, the child against parents, you end up disrupting the next generation, which is exactly what we're seeing come to fruition with Gen Z. Look at these stats here: https://www.teenvogue.com/story/survey-says-young-people-dont-identify-as-straight
So fewer and fewer younger people are identifying as straight. How do you think that's going to affect the already sky-high divorce rates that basically leave men emotionally and financially crippled? If you don't know how that racket operates, a female divorce lawyer actually lays out the stats how fatherless homes has ruined many a child: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlSwsE22nX0
There are also plenty of other stats to showcase how fatherless homes has affected everything from increased drug use to promiscuity: https://owlcation.com/social-sciences/Psychological-Effects-On-Men-Growing-Up-Without-A-Father
But circling back to the whole alphabet soup crisis, they're closer then they've ever been to legalizing pedophilia. This is going to come through the whole child trans movement, which is why they've been pushing so much for the trans angle lately, and promoting it so heavily in schools.
So if you follow the basic logic of everything that the alphabet mafia is doing it goes something like this:
The only thing they need to do now (and I expect this within the next decade or so) is to start legalizing a way for children to consent if they're under 18.
And before you say "That's preposterous", pretty boy Newsom has already laid the groundwork legally in Lucifer's bachelor pad, better known as California: https://www.liberty.edu/champion/2020/10/opinion-new-california-law-protecting-pedophilia-is-vile/
Same guy diff account for one last reply because I'm just a lurker.
You might be right that the political movement was corrupted from the start, but there was a legitimate reason to push for equal rights that just didn't exist (like same sex marriage). Now I'm of the opinion that once such rights have been acquired, political movements outlive their usefulness and are just prone to corruption and become puppets for the political powers or corpos that take over, so yes, the LGBT movement is perverted trash that is only good for promoting hate, segregation and outright vile insanity like destroying children's bodies. If you think you despise them, imagine what you would feel if these imbeciles spoke for you and considered you "their own" because you happen to like penis/vagina.
As for the endgame being "hetero conversion" I still don't agree. If trying to erase straight people (this is a conceptually silly idea that literally can't biologically happen) is a way to create tension and make people fight, then yes, because that's what I believe is the true endgame. I suppose it could be one more of their tactics to radicalize the discourse to force a backlash from normies who wouldn't care otherwise, like the trans kids or the non-binary thing.
Except there was no reason for same sex marriage to exist, since marriage is supposed to be a holy matrimony between man and woman. If they wanted civil unions, they could have them. Even then, same sex marriage was designed as a way to pervert a heterosexual institution with zero gain for the homosexual couples since homosexuals cannot procreate with one another, thus rendering holy matrimony void.
There were enough gays, lesbians, etc., to speak up and say that the organizations didn't speak for them, but that almost NEVER happened. There was no counter-movement, and now everybody in the alphabet soup parade is saying "B-b-but we're not that radical, we're not like them!" well, too little, too late, and too bad.
The tolerance for most people has worn thin, just like with BLM. If they wanted to kneel and cry about police brutality that's one thing, but then burning and looting and rioting turned it into a literal domestic terrorist organization, and now some of them are saying "B-b-but that's not what it was about!", well they should have done more to control the message, because trying to play the "woe is me" shtick no longer works when people have died, homes have been lost, businesses burned to the ground, and cities destroyed.
In the case of the whole Rainbow Reich movement, those kids who have undergone hormone treatment, those men who castrated themselves, those women who cut off their breasts, and every other poor sap who experimented in a lifestyle that took them down a deep, dark path of no return, can't just shrug their shoulders and get their lives back.
These social engineering movements have PERMANENTLY ruined lives, and all for ZERO benefit to society as a whole.
It doesn't matter if you believe it or not, it's already happened:
This one here is kind of the nail in the coffin about your denial of the matter:
Notice how all of those stories are treated? If a man left his wife to be with a young, hot secretary, all of those stories would have called it infidelity and the man a "pig", but because media promotes homosexual infidelity, it's paraded around as "Okay", and hetero-conversion is seen as "living your truth".
You can ignore the facts all you want and keep believing whatever you want, but it doesn't change reality.
Couple the media's insistence of grooming people into the alphabet lifestyle as early as pre-school, and the fact that the vaccines can cause infertility/pregnancy issues --
--And you can easily see how the multiple attack vectors of destabilizing the nuclear family, grooming children, and attempting to cut off the biological consistency of heterosexual couples is no joke.
Just to clarify, with "same guy" he is not referring to me.
Interesting how they they don't break this down by gender. I wonder if it's mostly women identifying as bi / lesbian.
It is.