You want whatever they are threatening to take away more than you want bodily autonomy.
Until someone holds you down and uses force, you are giving consent.
Fuck right off. By this logic, a strict vaccine mandate where you get thrown in prison if you are not vaccinated would still produce a population who "consented" to being vaccinated. So long as they don't physically force the needle in your arm, they can do whatever they want. Hell, by this logic, holding you at literal gun point and saying "agree to take the shot or die" still counts as consent as long as the man doesn't hold you down and force the needle in your arm.
The government punishing people who do not comply, whether that be a fine, losing your home, losing your job, being thrown in jail, or being killed, does not jive with the concept of consent.
Yes, people throughout history have repeatedly died to defend liberty, freedom and morals. If you aren't ready to lose everything to oppose evil, you are just a LARPing queer. Cope harder
Freedom requires sacrifice. Giving into a threat even though you really super duper don't want to is compliance. You want what they offer more than you want bodily autonomy.
Just like the actors and actresses who sucked dick to get a role.
Whether it's "compliance" or not doesn't make it "consent" in any real usage of the word.
Consenting under duress is not consent at all.
No, I don't want what they offer, I don't want them to take away what I already have. The government didn't "offer" me my freedom. But they are able to take it away.
Fuck right off. By this logic, a strict vaccine mandate where you get thrown in prison if you are not vaccinated would still produce a population who "consented" to being vaccinated. So long as they don't physically force the needle in your arm, they can do whatever they want. Hell, by this logic, holding you at literal gun point and saying "agree to take the shot or die" still counts as consent as long as the man doesn't hold you down and force the needle in your arm.
The government punishing people who do not comply, whether that be a fine, losing your home, losing your job, being thrown in jail, or being killed, does not jive with the concept of consent.
Yes, people throughout history have repeatedly died to defend liberty, freedom and morals. If you aren't ready to lose everything to oppose evil, you are just a LARPing queer. Cope harder
And people throughout history have also repeatedly made change without literally dying for it.
Whether you expect people to literally die for their cause or not doesn't change the fact that giving in to a threat is not "consent."
Freedom requires sacrifice. Giving into a threat even though you really super duper don't want to is compliance. You want what they offer more than you want bodily autonomy.
Just like the actors and actresses who sucked dick to get a role.
Whether it's "compliance" or not doesn't make it "consent" in any real usage of the word.
Consenting under duress is not consent at all.
No, I don't want what they offer, I don't want them to take away what I already have. The government didn't "offer" me my freedom. But they are able to take it away.