Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

49
Research-73 teams tested the same hypotheses with the SAME data. Some found negative results, some positive, some nada. "Idiosyncratic researcher variability is a threat to the reliability of scientific findings." (Proof that “Diversity hire academics are just making shit up”) (osf.io)
posted 3 years ago by NotAGlowy 3 years ago by NotAGlowy +49 / -0
13 comments share
13 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– thepalagoon 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

This is true, but at least it was once a confounding variable that you tried to control for. With raw data there are ways we can do checks to see if someone is full of shit (even after the fact) --

--but these idiots with Liberal Arts degrees (and I am one of them and was once an idiot) have no such controls.

When a quack doctor releases data showing something outrageous, it's usually very easy to find the flaws in the data collection or the data interpretation.

When I was a grad student in Sociology (I told you I used to be one of those idiots), my department hired a professor whose parents were illegals and who wrote exclusively about the terrible plight of illegals. They made a big show about how they hired him and gave him the biggest starting salary they ever gave any professor and fast tracked him on tenure.

Two years later he was gone (as was I. Long gone at that point) -- I dunno if he failed tenure review or what, but all of his work was so infiltrated with his own biases it wouldn't surprise me. But in a Sociological journal you don't have that raw data, you don't have controls for confounding, you just have a name on a page and trust they have integrity.

This is how bad ideas get spread and passed off as legitimate. Academia as an institution needs to be burnt down and rebuilt from the foundations.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– tobeornotto 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The role on academia in the next decades will be to clean the records.

They will scrub everything unwanted. Texts, data, studies, records, books, papers. It will all be memoryholed.

You can't have data or studies casting doubt on blank slate theory, or consequntialism as a sound ethical model. You can't just have stuff like heritability and twin studies lying around.

Academia will be reduced to a toolbox to support leftist thought. It's already almost there.

They'll hide the methodology behind paywalls, traditions and customs, groupthink, and gaslighting, and people will only see the headlines.

Lo and behold - it turns out that the leftists were right all along! About everything! Look, the Science proves it!

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

The below rules are just a summary of the rules which can be found in the Welcome Ashore post.

.

ONE: Do not post Illegal Activity, or criminal manifestos.

.

TWO: Do not engage in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence.

.

THREE: Do not threaten, harass, defame, or bully users.

.

FOUR: Do not post involuntary Salacious Material.

.

FIVE: Do not post Porn

.

SIX: NSFW content must be flaired NSFW.

.

SEVEN: Do not post Facebook accounts or twitter accounts with less than 500 followers, and personal information.

.

EIGHT: Do not intentionally deceive others by impersonating another.

.

NINE: Do not solicit or engage in transactions that are federally regulated by the US govt.

.

TEN: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

ELEVEN: Do not post spam.

.

TWELVE: Do not post intentional falsehoods or hoaxes.

.

THIRTEEN: No reposts

.

FOURTEEN: Do not post more than 5 posts a day to this sub.

.

FIFTEEN: Do not direct particularly egregious identity based slurs at users.

.

SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring.


Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • ClockworkFool
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - st5vn (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy