Seemingly theirs are not, because we cater to their every whim in society.
Not if sanity takes hold. It's a very elite subset of women whose every whim is catered to. Not the working-class girls in Rotherham.
Exactly. Why on earth would I want the kind of evil I talk about in the same house as me?
Are you really that delusional that you think 'woman=evil'? Perhaps take a look at the murder statistics. Oh wait, THEEEEY have already brushed out all the tens of thousands of murders by women, right?
Taxing the successful to give it to those who chose to prioritize other things seems pretty communist.
You keep bringing that story up like it wasn't covered up by women at all levels so they could keep being elected. It just proves they prioritize our misery over protecting their own. That's called sadism.
Well, it's quite helpful when the deaths are classed as suicide while they are directly responsible for making them feel that way.
If we added all the suicides they caused as their murders, it wouldn't even be close.
Taxing the successful to give it to those who chose to prioritize other things seems pretty communist.
A genetic dead end is not successful.
You keep bringing that story up like it wasn't covered up by women at all levels so they could keep being elected.
You just claimed that 'women' have all their whims catered to. So why is it that the girls in Rotherham did not? Or maybe I was right and it's only a certain kind of women who gets that.
It just proves they prioritize our misery over protecting their own. That's called sadism.
I'm pretty sure that your bete noir Jesse Philips doesn't care about your "misery", but about her own political success.
Well, it's quite helpful when the deaths are classed as suicide while they are directly responsible for making them feel that way.
Hahaha, not only do you sometimes defend troons, you're even adopting their arguments in trying to blame others for the suicides of one group. Absolute delusion.
Then maybe you just need to pay way more in taxes so others can get more money to raise their kids.
I meant that your personal preferences are irrelevant, like everyone's are.
...you're talking about them 24/7.
That sounds like communism with extra steps.
Seemingly theirs are not, because we cater to their every whim in society.
Exactly. Why on earth would I want the kind of evil I talk about in the same house as me?
Only if you have no idea what communism is.
Not if sanity takes hold. It's a very elite subset of women whose every whim is catered to. Not the working-class girls in Rotherham.
Are you really that delusional that you think 'woman=evil'? Perhaps take a look at the murder statistics. Oh wait, THEEEEY have already brushed out all the tens of thousands of murders by women, right?
Taxing the successful to give it to those who chose to prioritize other things seems pretty communist.
You keep bringing that story up like it wasn't covered up by women at all levels so they could keep being elected. It just proves they prioritize our misery over protecting their own. That's called sadism.
Well, it's quite helpful when the deaths are classed as suicide while they are directly responsible for making them feel that way.
If we added all the suicides they caused as their murders, it wouldn't even be close.
A genetic dead end is not successful.
You just claimed that 'women' have all their whims catered to. So why is it that the girls in Rotherham did not? Or maybe I was right and it's only a certain kind of women who gets that.
I'm pretty sure that your bete noir Jesse Philips doesn't care about your "misery", but about her own political success.
Hahaha, not only do you sometimes defend troons, you're even adopting their arguments in trying to blame others for the suicides of one group. Absolute delusion.