Individual male sports are meritocracy. Team sports allow room for affirmative action picks and for women sports are not exactly about merit, if it was a meritocracy then they would be competing along side men.
Meritocracy would be the best win no matter any other factors. Fact is that if they did that then very few women would be competing. In order to give women place at the table we created the women sport categories.
That is special treatment, not meritocracy.
Case in point, for esports, chess, racing and math you have mixed gender competitions and women competition, there is no men only competition.
Individual male sports are meritocracy. Team sports allow room for affirmative action picks and for women sports are not exactly about merit, if it was a meritocracy then they would be competing along side men.
No, the fairest meritocracy would be women's sports being thrown in the trash as the parasitic organization they are.
They wouldn't exist without leeching off men's organizations, which is a funny parallel to most of society.
Meritocracy would be the best win no matter any other factors. Fact is that if they did that then very few women would be competing. In order to give women place at the table we created the women sport categories. That is special treatment, not meritocracy.
Case in point, for esports, chess, racing and math you have mixed gender competitions and women competition, there is no men only competition.