What a moronic cartoon, but then again, it's to be expected from the batshit crazy MRA/MGTOW and assorted pathetic weasels.
I'll pick out just two. Should government strengthen the rights of divorced women? Of course, people will always answer 'yes' if you ask them about strengthening rights. The same people would probably answer yes if you asked them about strenghtening thet rights of divorced men.
And feminism succeeding because they're rude, repulsive and disgusting. No. They succeed because identitarian ideologues control the levers of power. You might as well be stupid and think that BLM succeeded because it's violent and because it rioted. What would happen if the other side rioted? Well, we found out - then suddenly the power centers are not shilling for you, and you get railroaded.
Would you say rights of women are a preposterous idea and entirely bad/evil goal to have? Or are you going to go the Totally-Not-A-Feminist™ route of "advocating for men's rights is a bad goal, because mens already have all the rights there can be had"
Would you say rights of women are a preposterous idea
Yes, group rights are a cancer. IDPol is a cancer. There should be no organizations campaigning for the particularistic interests of one group.
Or are you going to go the Totally-Not-A-Feminist™ route of "advocating for men's rights is a bad goal, because mens already have all the rights there can be had"
I think it's like feminism, where there may be places where men are treated unfairly, but people whack out like Paul Elam.
What a moronic cartoon, but then again, it's to be expected from the batshit crazy MRA/MGTOW and assorted pathetic weasels.
I'll pick out just two. Should government strengthen the rights of divorced women? Of course, people will always answer 'yes' if you ask them about strengthening rights. The same people would probably answer yes if you asked them about strenghtening thet rights of divorced men.
And feminism succeeding because they're rude, repulsive and disgusting. No. They succeed because identitarian ideologues control the levers of power. You might as well be stupid and think that BLM succeeded because it's violent and because it rioted. What would happen if the other side rioted? Well, we found out - then suddenly the power centers are not shilling for you, and you get railroaded.
Don't listen to morons.
I think this one was for you
but then again, it can just be you having shit for brains.
It's criticizing MRAs from the perspective that their goals are good.
Goals like... rights of men
Would you say rights of women are a preposterous idea and entirely bad/evil goal to have? Or are you going to go the Totally-Not-A-Feminist™ route of "advocating for men's rights is a bad goal, because mens already have all the rights there can be had"
Yes, group rights are a cancer. IDPol is a cancer. There should be no organizations campaigning for the particularistic interests of one group.
I think it's like feminism, where there may be places where men are treated unfairly, but people whack out like Paul Elam.