Next you'll cite the War on Poverty. Can't you at least dial down the ridiculousness to the point that you're only as ridiculous as the average feminist, instead of more so?
To destroy people now is not a job for tanks and jets, but a job for psychologists and sociologists.
This is correct. But how come that even when you have a valid point, you phrase it in such a profoundly stupid manner that you make yourself look like a moron?
I see you're in the 'redefining words' phase of your feminism.
Like I said, there's almost no difference between you and a feminist - except that you're even more whacked.
The Cold War was considered a war. No direct fighting between the two nations ever happened.
We have moved on from the past. To destroy people now is not a job for tanks and jets, but a job for psychologists and sociologists.
Next you'll cite the War on Poverty. Can't you at least dial down the ridiculousness to the point that you're only as ridiculous as the average feminist, instead of more so?
This is correct. But how come that even when you have a valid point, you phrase it in such a profoundly stupid manner that you make yourself look like a moron?