"Interesting that the sourcing for this claim so far is only unreliable sources," he says smugly as he declares every source he doesn't like unreliable.
Are they really that stupid or are they just so evil they have no qualms acting like the bad guy in a Saturday morning cartoon so long as they're furthering The Cause?
Wikipedia editors are usually so autistically devoted to Wikipedia they exist in a world where they cannot see through anything but Wikipedia bureaucracy. Once you are that deep in their world, I'm sure the logic makes sense like any good management stooge.
"Interesting that the sourcing for this claim so far is only unreliable sources," he says smugly as he declares every source he doesn't like unreliable.
Are they really that stupid or are they just so evil they have no qualms acting like the bad guy in a Saturday morning cartoon so long as they're furthering The Cause?
Wikipedia editors are usually so autistically devoted to Wikipedia they exist in a world where they cannot see through anything but Wikipedia bureaucracy. Once you are that deep in their world, I'm sure the logic makes sense like any good management stooge.