It's so crazy when they act like violating your rights is OK as long as you get the choice of which of two rights is violated:
You can either have you freedom of religion violated, or your right against unwarranted searches violated (this case).
You can either have your right against unwarranted searches violated, or you can have your right of free travel violated (TSA).
You can either have your right to free speech, or you can have your right to preserve your life through self defense ("instigating" violence from someone else by saying something mean, then defending yourself from their violence with appropriate force").
It's so crazy when they act like violating your rights is OK as long as you get the choice of which of two rights is violated:
You can either have you freedom of religion violated, or your right against unwarranted searches violated (this case).
You can either have your right against unwarranted searches violated, or you can have your right of free travel violated (TSA).
You can either have your right to free speech, or you can have your right to preserve your life through self defense ("instigating" violence from someone else by saying something mean, then defending yourself from their violence with appropriate force").