"It can't just be that it's against my religion," Wilkes said. "It's still a broad standard and it needs to be a sincerely held belief and not just subterfuge because you don't trust the science."
The entire "sincerely held belief" idea is ridiculous, as if you could know someone's mind and what they actually believe.
"Why, yes, Bureaucratic Drone #32145, I would love to demonstrate my sincerely held religious beliefs to you. It should only take a few hundred hours of background material. See you at church on Sunday?"
The entire "sincerely held belief" idea is ridiculous, as if you could know someone's mind and what they actually believe.
How do you prove religious beliefs?
I see what's going on here. They're going to try and get people to think claiming exemption is too much effort and break them into getting jabbed.
#MoreFeminineWay demands more male corpses.
"Why, yes, Bureaucratic Drone #32145, I would love to demonstrate my sincerely held religious beliefs to you. It should only take a few hundred hours of background material. See you at church on Sunday?"
I’m not going to debate anyone, much less some dumb atheist bureaucrat on how valid my beliefs are.