More of their twisting of the Constitution BS. They cite a case from 1932 as if that's supposed to be some landmark. Well, I give them too much credit, they didn't cite anything they mention it. So I looked it up, it's New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann. The key question of the case was whether or not the manufacture of ice was a public utility. Yep, that sounds exactly relevant to vaccine mandates, right? That's right, because the Supreme Court decided to tell Oklahoma that ice manufacture was not a public utility in 1932, so shall glorious leader Biden be allowed to tell states to enforce vaccines.
Otherwise, same old drivel of apply interstate commerce clause to everything they possibly can like they have been doing for far too long. Add in a bit of the old nonsense about how you not wearing a mask is infringing on my right to assemble because I'm going to be killed by your face if I assemble. All the typical stuff they try to claim is "freedom."
More of their twisting of the Constitution BS. They cite a case from 1932 as if that's supposed to be some landmark. Well, I give them too much credit, they didn't cite anything they mention it. So I looked it up, it's New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann. The key question of the case was whether or not the manufacture of ice was a public utility. Yep, that sounds exactly relevant to vaccine mandates, right? That's right, because the Supreme Court decided to tell Oklahoma that ice manufacture was not a public utility in 1932, so shall glorious leader Biden be allowed to tell states to enforce vaccines.
Otherwise, same old drivel of apply interstate commerce clause to everything they possibly can like they have been doing for far too long. Add in a bit of the old nonsense about how you not wearing a mask is infringing on my right to assemble because I'm going to be killed by your face if I assemble. All the typical stuff they try to claim is "freedom."
https://mobile.twitter.com/TenthAmendment