Your definition of degeneracy is 100% designed to be abusive and promote authoritarian punishments down the road once you've established a new normal.
Race is not blood and soil, the entire Nazi conception of race doesn't make sense by any standard of measurement. The entire soil concept is literally "magic dirt". This is why you can't have an honest discussion about genetics and behavior, you're not even approaching the argument. You're making a political argument.
No one built anything to support "their race". The Danes didn't build castles for the Scots, the Spanish didn't build cathedrals for Canadians, etc. The entire concept of racial solidarity is in violation of national sovereignty. Racialism is a betrayal of Nationalism at best because it is an abandonment of your nation to identify with people who are outside your community, don't speak your language, don't share your culture, aren't of the same religion, don't have any ties to you, but look kind of like you.
People build things for their direct communities and their children. Not their race.
Racialism doesn't have a monopoly on tradition, it's a violation of it.
Your definition of degeneracy is 100% designed to be abusive and promote authoritarian punishments down the road once you've established a new normal.
I could say the exact same thing about the bloated ruleset here, and have.
The difference being that my system is not designed to suppress, but to uplift.
Race is not blood and soil, the entire Nazi conception of race doesn't make sense by any standard of measurement.
It's not the Nazi concept.
Race is inherent to all elder society m civilizations. A nation is bred of its people.
Look at America today. It barely even resembles what it was created as. Those changes were most severe and drastic following the immigration expansion of the 50s.
No one built anything to support "their race". The Danes didn't build castles for the Scots, the Spanish didn't build cathedrals for Canadians, etc. The entire concept of racial solidarity is in violation of national sovereignty.
What in the hell are you talking about?
The Scots aren't Danish, nor the Spanish Canadian.
The Danes acted out of preference to Danes. The Spanish for Spaniards. This went for a thousand years and held nations together.
abandonment of your nation to identify with people who are outside your community, don't speak your language, don't share your culture, aren't of the same religion, don't have any ties to you, but look kind of like you.
You've completely twisted and destroyed the idea of race in order to make this argument.
Language is racial. Culture is racial. Religion is racial.
All of this is bred and created through blood and soil. When you say nonsense like this you're throwing away a millennium of evolutionary selection that breeds the differences between men. There are major differences between the various European tribes, AND YET, because of their long history of interbreeding, war, and trade, they are mostly very culturally connected.
The same cannot be said of Africans. There is no higher connection between the racial umbrella of black and white, and we can see the effect of this today by just looking around. It's like mixing oil and water.
Now the Asians in my opinion have much more in common due to ancient migratory patterns of the Aryans. Northern India was basically ruled by a racial caste of whites, and it's embedded into their religion.
People build things for their direct communities and their children. Not their race.
Brother, that IS RACE.
It was only in the past few century that these ideas were decoupled and what they've been twisted into DOES NOT WORK.
You can very plainly see that this modern abomination is a complete and abject failure. There is not a single facet of the modern view of race, of culture, of society, that is successful.
Racialism doesn't have a monopoly on tradition, it's a violation of it.
That is a leftist argument.
You cling to a modern definition and ideological view of an ancient concept. Worse, you cling to a worldview that is a proven failure.
Race is tradition because it dwells in the history of a people. We are told to throw this away and to fight and honor our neighbors who we have nothing in common with, do not share our blood, and are actively opposed to our way of life.
Again, I pity you.
You call me a leftist yet you're fully committed to the bolshevik mindset.
Your definition of degeneracy is 100% designed to be abusive and promote authoritarian punishments down the road once you've established a new normal.
Race is not blood and soil, the entire Nazi conception of race doesn't make sense by any standard of measurement. The entire soil concept is literally "magic dirt". This is why you can't have an honest discussion about genetics and behavior, you're not even approaching the argument. You're making a political argument.
No one built anything to support "their race". The Danes didn't build castles for the Scots, the Spanish didn't build cathedrals for Canadians, etc. The entire concept of racial solidarity is in violation of national sovereignty. Racialism is a betrayal of Nationalism at best because it is an abandonment of your nation to identify with people who are outside your community, don't speak your language, don't share your culture, aren't of the same religion, don't have any ties to you, but look kind of like you.
People build things for their direct communities and their children. Not their race.
Racialism doesn't have a monopoly on tradition, it's a violation of it.
I could say the exact same thing about the bloated ruleset here, and have.
The difference being that my system is not designed to suppress, but to uplift.
It's not the Nazi concept.
Race is inherent to all elder society m civilizations. A nation is bred of its people.
Look at America today. It barely even resembles what it was created as. Those changes were most severe and drastic following the immigration expansion of the 50s.
What in the hell are you talking about?
The Scots aren't Danish, nor the Spanish Canadian.
The Danes acted out of preference to Danes. The Spanish for Spaniards. This went for a thousand years and held nations together.
You've completely twisted and destroyed the idea of race in order to make this argument.
Language is racial. Culture is racial. Religion is racial.
All of this is bred and created through blood and soil. When you say nonsense like this you're throwing away a millennium of evolutionary selection that breeds the differences between men. There are major differences between the various European tribes, AND YET, because of their long history of interbreeding, war, and trade, they are mostly very culturally connected.
The same cannot be said of Africans. There is no higher connection between the racial umbrella of black and white, and we can see the effect of this today by just looking around. It's like mixing oil and water.
Now the Asians in my opinion have much more in common due to ancient migratory patterns of the Aryans. Northern India was basically ruled by a racial caste of whites, and it's embedded into their religion.
Brother, that IS RACE.
It was only in the past few century that these ideas were decoupled and what they've been twisted into DOES NOT WORK.
You can very plainly see that this modern abomination is a complete and abject failure. There is not a single facet of the modern view of race, of culture, of society, that is successful.
That is a leftist argument.
You cling to a modern definition and ideological view of an ancient concept. Worse, you cling to a worldview that is a proven failure.
Race is tradition because it dwells in the history of a people. We are told to throw this away and to fight and honor our neighbors who we have nothing in common with, do not share our blood, and are actively opposed to our way of life.
Again, I pity you.
You call me a leftist yet you're fully committed to the bolshevik mindset.