I know full well what you 'know', and that most of it is false, because of all your predictions that turn out false.
I guess it should be no surprise that you'd shill for a baby rapist when the baby is.... female. 'Member when you said that you were OK with people killing 5-year-old girls? You're messed up in the head, and you're going to end up in prison after some sort of mass shooting.
Brought to you by the guy who said that women would be exempted from taking the vaccine, that the MN cop would not be indicted, etc. I'll take my personal verification over your usual hallucinations.
I never said that. You're just making shit up now.
You did though, and many called you out for it. You claimed you said it because you were so sure that they would not harm kids if they are girls.
Don't need to be exempted when only men get heart problems from it. She still hasn't even seen the inside of a jail, so I wouldn't get too excited. Has anyone heard about her at all since the first week?
Right, you mean where I said they should make women and girls take the vaccine, to prove that they actually believe it works, because they keep shilling it to us?
Since then, the thing got approved by the FDA (led by a woman), shilled by the ACLU (led by a woman) and mandated by several of the vile pro-feminism companies on my boycott list.
I would say I hit something interesting, but not one people were comfortable with having talked about.
Let me guess: 'they' tried to kill you and ended up killing one of their own?
Note that I feel little sympathy for her for different reasons, because she is s a journalist.
She still hasn't even seen the inside of a jail, so I wouldn't get too excited.
You're already at 2 false predictions on that case alone. You then made two more. You claimed that the charges would be 'quietly dropped' as well.
Since then, the thing got approved by the FDA (led by a woman), shilled by the ACLU (led by a woman) and mandated by several of the vile pro-feminism companies on my boycott list.
I know full well what you 'know', and that most of it is false, because of all your predictions that turn out false.
I guess it should be no surprise that you'd shill for a baby rapist when the baby is.... female. 'Member when you said that you were OK with people killing 5-year-old girls? You're messed up in the head, and you're going to end up in prison after some sort of mass shooting.
I'm not shilling for anyone. That person doesn't exist. If you can't see obvious bait, I can't help you see it.
I never said that. You're just making shit up now.
Brought to you by the guy who said that women would be exempted from taking the vaccine, that the MN cop would not be indicted, etc. I'll take my personal verification over your usual hallucinations.
You did though, and many called you out for it. You claimed you said it because you were so sure that they would not harm kids if they are girls.
Don't need to be exempted when only men get heart problems from it. She still hasn't even seen the inside of a jail, so I wouldn't get too excited. Has anyone heard about her at all since the first week?
Right, you mean where I said they should make women and girls take the vaccine, to prove that they actually believe it works, because they keep shilling it to us?
Since then, the thing got approved by the FDA (led by a woman), shilled by the ACLU (led by a woman) and mandated by several of the vile pro-feminism companies on my boycott list.
I would say I hit something interesting, but not one people were comfortable with having talked about.
https://archive.is/lZQnB
Let me guess: 'they' tried to kill you and ended up killing one of their own?
Note that I feel little sympathy for her for different reasons, because she is s a journalist.
You're already at 2 false predictions on that case alone. You then made two more. You claimed that the charges would be 'quietly dropped' as well.
Why do you have to be so crazy?