The condition that Cosby made the statement that he drugged a woman was that it would not be usable in court thereafter. It was then used in the court case that sentenced him. By using it, they were able to bring more accusers to testify, which is what won the case.
The statement and following accusers were struck because of the agreement violation. One of the people that was involved in sentencing him was involved in the original agreement, so he knew he was in violation, but did it anyway.
Its not that Cosby didn't do the actions (he admitted to doing it at least once), but that the court acted wrong in attempting to prove it, and therefore not guilty.
The condition that Cosby made the statement that he drugged a woman was that it would not be usable in court thereafter. It was then used in the court case that sentenced him. By using it, they were able to bring more accusers to testify, which is what won the case.
The statement and following accusers were struck because of the agreement violation. One of the people that was involved in sentencing him was involved in the original agreement, so he knew he was in violation, but did it anyway.
Its not that Cosby didn't do the actions (he admitted to doing it at least once), but that the court acted wrong in attempting to prove it, and therefore not guilty.
He also only really admitted to partying with quaaludes. That's not the same thing as saying "I gave people date rape drugs in order to rape them."