Lol, I don't care. You haven't engaged with my points at all and keep repeating the same shit no matter how many times I point out I'd already addressed your argument. It's like you can see the letters, read the words, look up the definitions, use them in a sentence and yet somehow you STILL have no idea what I said.
Taking the time to read yet another wall of text and rebut each point just so you can ignore it and say it again but harder is pointless. Simp harder, you absolute clown.
You lack the basic comprehension needed to understand that I've already addressed that point several times and that I never once disagreed that Disney might have broken contract in that manner.
What point have I not engaged with?
These?
“ I made 2 good points that you ignored:
a greater number of subscribers may have watched the movie than the number lost from theater tickets
there are many people who might watch it on someone elses' subscription but never would have watched the movie otherwise(people like me).”
Neither are relevant since that’s not how the subscription service works and is based off an assumption not relevant to the case.
You replied with an increasing sized wall of text repeating the same thing. I respond and you shout “TLDR SIMP! You keep saying the same thing.”
I summed it up for you at the bottom. Enjoy wearing your Mickey ears
Lol, I don't care. You haven't engaged with my points at all and keep repeating the same shit no matter how many times I point out I'd already addressed your argument. It's like you can see the letters, read the words, look up the definitions, use them in a sentence and yet somehow you STILL have no idea what I said.
Taking the time to read yet another wall of text and rebut each point just so you can ignore it and say it again but harder is pointless. Simp harder, you absolute clown.
I did address your arguments. Your arguments lack the basic understanding of how the film was released on Disney plus. Take your L.
You lack the basic comprehension needed to understand that I've already addressed that point several times and that I never once disagreed that Disney might have broken contract in that manner.
What point have I not engaged with? These? “ I made 2 good points that you ignored: a greater number of subscribers may have watched the movie than the number lost from theater tickets
there are many people who might watch it on someone elses' subscription but never would have watched the movie otherwise(people like me).”
Neither are relevant since that’s not how the subscription service works and is based off an assumption not relevant to the case.
You replied with an increasing sized wall of text repeating the same thing. I respond and you shout “TLDR SIMP! You keep saying the same thing.”