But I'm sure you believe the stories from all of the young boys they also raped. Of course, there's even less media coverage about those cases, but it happened. Should we treat those reports with the same degree of callous skepticism?
How is it a false equivalency? The fact that 13 year old girls already carry such strong gendered hatred is a very important one.
It used to be that violent and hateful ideologies were followed by solely adults but the rise of feminism in the UK has produced children who are already wired to hate.
But many of the same men who have been accused of perpetrating these crimes against young girls have also been accused of doing the same to boys. You're willing to believe that those claims are credible, but you don't accept that these accused rapists likely also raped girls as well as boys? And then, to back that up, you bring up an incident that has nothing to do with the topic.
Of all of the people on this forum, I am actually one of the most sympathetic to your assertions about women. But you're not doing yourself or your crusade any favours by single-mindedly refusing to accept that it is actually still possible for women to be victims of some things, sometimes.
But I'm sure you believe the stories from all of the young boys they also raped. Of course, there's even less media coverage about those cases, but it happened. Should we treat those reports with the same degree of callous skepticism?
Of course I believe boys, because you don't hear stories about boys murdering girls for political reasons at 13!
False equivalency. One case has nothing to do with the other.
How is it a false equivalency? The fact that 13 year old girls already carry such strong gendered hatred is a very important one.
It used to be that violent and hateful ideologies were followed by solely adults but the rise of feminism in the UK has produced children who are already wired to hate.
It's early stage SCUM Manifesto.
But many of the same men who have been accused of perpetrating these crimes against young girls have also been accused of doing the same to boys. You're willing to believe that those claims are credible, but you don't accept that these accused rapists likely also raped girls as well as boys? And then, to back that up, you bring up an incident that has nothing to do with the topic.
Of all of the people on this forum, I am actually one of the most sympathetic to your assertions about women. But you're not doing yourself or your crusade any favours by single-mindedly refusing to accept that it is actually still possible for women to be victims of some things, sometimes.