That's a fair argument, but there are already women in the military. What difference does it make at this point?
You can't argue combat effectiveness when it's filled with angry lesbians making everyone feel like shit, people spewing women's race propaganda as "training" and top ranking officers who are scared of their own shadows.
That ship sailed a long time ago, so it is now just about who is worth more.
Also, you made a really good point against yourself accidentally. If you wouldn't even put them out if they were on fire, why on earth would you give your life to protect them?
According to these people, yes.
And they're right.
So a woman's life is worth more than your own?
You'd sacrifice your life for one of those Donna Hylton worshipping murder cultists?
Women have different roles. It's not about who is worth more. Men are fit for combat. Women are not.
As for Women's Marchers, I wouldn't douse them if they were on fire.
That's a fair argument, but there are already women in the military. What difference does it make at this point?
You can't argue combat effectiveness when it's filled with angry lesbians making everyone feel like shit, people spewing women's race propaganda as "training" and top ranking officers who are scared of their own shadows.
That ship sailed a long time ago, so it is now just about who is worth more.
Also, you made a really good point against yourself accidentally. If you wouldn't even put them out if they were on fire, why on earth would you give your life to protect them?