They do. It's other areas where the null hypothesis is ignored. For example, if some whackjob P-hacked a study that shows that listening to Mozart makes you smarter, and you do another study showing that it's false, the journal will be much less interested in publishing something that shows an obvious falsity to be false, rather than a new "eating blueberries makes you smarter!" study that will have been P-hacked by then.
Same thing with clinical trials for new drugs.
Studies that don't show a positive result never see the light of day.
They do. It's other areas where the null hypothesis is ignored. For example, if some whackjob P-hacked a study that shows that listening to Mozart makes you smarter, and you do another study showing that it's false, the journal will be much less interested in publishing something that shows an obvious falsity to be false, rather than a new "eating blueberries makes you smarter!" study that will have been P-hacked by then.