Thanks In Advance
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
They do not. Anyone who tells you they do is the same kind of idiot who five years ago would have been crying murder about WiFi giving them cancer.
There's no mechanism for wifi to give one cancer. There is a mechanism for spike proteins to be shed, assuming that the nanolipids do not stay in the deltoid muscle (which they should but don't) and the spike proteins don't stay bound to the surface of the cell (which they should but don't) then if you cough you are possibly shedding spike proteins just like if you had covid you'd be shedding whole viruses.
I'm more vaccine credulous than average around here but acting like there's no mechanism for protein shedding is some NPC shit.
COVID-19 is only contagious because it self-replicates. Even if we accept for the sake of argument that it is possible for spike proteins to migrate from where they are created to your lungs, to be exhaled, to be inhaled by another person, each of those steps will by necessity have substantial losses. We know that the spike protein can't be that toxic, because that spike protein is a part of a virus with a ~1% mortality rate, so without the ability to replace those losses you're not going to have significant exposure even if any exposure exists.
"Is the shed protein dangerous" is a different question than "do they shed spike protein" which is what you answered "they do not" too. You're also assuming that the spike protein can't be more dangerous than a whole virus which may be true but not necessarily because nanoscale structures can be physically dangerous just because of their size and shape, and the spike protein is roughly the size of an asbestos fibril.
https://principia-scientific.com/covid-vaccinated-can-shed-spike-protein-harming-unvaccinated/