Was thinking about this earlier. There is no actual transitive properties to being transsexual or transgender. By all scientific standards a “trans” person is accurately described as pseudosexual, or an imitation of another sex. It is abundantly clear that “trans” has no complete transition, it is an imitation, and in most cases a mockery. A transient state requires a completed transition, this is of course impossible for “trans” people because they can’t remake their dna or grow ovaries/ testes. Pseudo is the only apt description for someone who believes they are a different biological makeup and attempts an imitation of that makeup.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Trans 'women' are a subset of men, yes. Their delusion is no reason to distinguish them.
Nah. There's no such thing as 'transition'. That is an impossibility. If a group of people decided to 'transition' to being a whale, that would not change their ontological status. Nor these loons.
Then that is to be dealt with. But you don't deal with it by surrendering. Once you buy into their nonsense, you have already lost. Once you pretend that delusional men are women, you have removed the very ground on which you can stop any of the other things.
It is the only position that has a chance of winning. Saying A through Y and then trying to hold the line at Z is an impossibility.