Was thinking about this earlier. There is no actual transitive properties to being transsexual or transgender. By all scientific standards a “trans” person is accurately described as pseudosexual, or an imitation of another sex. It is abundantly clear that “trans” has no complete transition, it is an imitation, and in most cases a mockery. A transient state requires a completed transition, this is of course impossible for “trans” people because they can’t remake their dna or grow ovaries/ testes. Pseudo is the only apt description for someone who believes they are a different biological makeup and attempts an imitation of that makeup.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
you would have to be retarded to believe this is a scientific statement. You refuse to even acknowledge 3rd grade level genomics. XY women can not have children. The female hormones and oocytes put in them are not theirs, they did not create the egg, they share no genetics with the egg. The most an XY woman can hope to be is an incubator for another woman's genes.
You linked two cases, 1 gave "birth" to someone else's genetics, in other words, not "her" kid. The other was not XY, but an amalgamation of three separate Karyotypes. You have actually demonstrated my point for me, twice.