I believe they might preform labiaplasty or whatever this is on people where it gets in the way sitting and stuff. But like with excess skin removal, male breast reductions, other reconstructive stuff, I think you need to prove prolonged trouble. In other words, it cannot just cosmetic.
That's not remotely similar. Nobody will see your private parts unless you get into a sexual situation, while breasts are immediately visible.
I shouldn't have to pay so a woman can have sex. It's as ridiculous as ugly people making women pay for their faces to be fixed.
Do you know how insurance premiums are calculated? Every bit of bullshit extra coverage for useless issues pushes everyone's prices up.
Cry more, Tallest.
I'm 99% sure that it isn't covered.
Imagine being so sad that you create your 4th account to provide useless and unwanted commentary.
Which is a normal part of human health?
Whether your insurance pays for that or not is between you and your insurance company. Maybe you can switch to one that doesn't.
I'm sorry, what?
Women constantly say people aren't entitled to sex. Practice what you preach.
I believe they might preform labiaplasty or whatever this is on people where it gets in the way sitting and stuff. But like with excess skin removal, male breast reductions, other reconstructive stuff, I think you need to prove prolonged trouble. In other words, it cannot just cosmetic.