Noticed that vaccines have been brought up in quite a few comment sections, even in posts that are only tangentially related, but that there wasn't a post specifically about the intent behind the vaccines.
So anyone with theories or thoughts related to the vaccine and the push for it, this is your discussion thread.
My personal thoughts: the ultimate intent is a combination of population control, and consolidation of power, for 3 reasons:
- most developed nations, both west and east, are facing an imminent unbalance in age demographics because the baby boomers are getting to the age where they already have (or are about to) retire en masse. This will put massive pressure on government programs, with too many takers and not enough working taxpayers. So they want the old people to die before this happens.
(As an aside, this was arguably the main reason why they recently tried to push mass migration, to get more taxpayers. But we all know how that went)
-
I've seen people argue (not unreasonably) along the lines of "why would they kill the most obedient ones?" Because right now, the dissidents are protected from the elite, by safety in numbers. They (we?) Can easily blend into a crowd to hide. But what happens if the elite kill the obedient, and there is no crowd left to hide in? They will much more easily be able to control people, when there are fewer people.
-
people behind vaccine development/distribution like Gates and the WEF, have openly stated population reduction to be a goal of theirs for various reasons.
That's the gist of my thoughts. Any other opinions are welcome
Interestingly enough, this is literally a conspiracy that's being questioned by doctors, including Dr. Malone, who wondered if perhaps the vaccines are killing more people than what we think, but due to "masking" (where co-morbidity, age, etc.,) are hiding the real numbers?
That's literally what some of the researchers believe is happening, which is why their accounts were banned from social media and a similar peer reviewed report was pulled from publication.
Heh, once again, this is also being queried by the rightfully skeptic practitioners within the medical community. I suspect this is also why the FDA and other health authorities are prohibiting the tracking of deaths from those who take the vaccine. Even with the self-reported VAERs submissions, there's a lot of trends popping up that seem to indicate that even if you don't suffer from blood clots, aneurysms, strokes, partial paralysis, or myocarditis, it could induce other chronic health complications over a period of time. A perfect cover for the orchestrators to throw up their hands and say it "wasn't the vaccines!"
Actually, this isn't as tin-foil as you think. Malone subtly framed questions that nearly asked exactly what you postulated and that's actually what led to him being suspend on social media. It's also why those within the medical community who actually want to do the right thing began setting up a new method of attempting to track death rates for the vaccines, or vaccine-related deaths for the long-term, even without the help of the FDA.
Whether or not that tracking will be reliable is anyone's guess, but for people who seem to understand what's actually going on, and for those who are attempting to thwart the opaque measures put into place by Big Pharma/FDA/government, they appear to be thinking very much in alignment with you.