Does anyone remember the link that was in?
My specific question is that someone commented how the international bankers goal is to shift wealth from US to China which would make them trillions. How would this make them trillions?
Does anyone remember the link that was in?
My specific question is that someone commented how the international bankers goal is to shift wealth from US to China which would make them trillions. How would this make them trillions?
I work in banking and am very well educated in finance. I can explain.
To simplify things, banks take money from savings and reallocates it toward investments through credit. Banks profit when the cost they pay to savers is low and the price they charge to investors is high.
The prices are based on supply and demand. Thus from a banks perspective, they always make the most money by paying savers in areas where the demand for savers money is low and the quantity of savers is high. The USA would count as this type of location right now. The bank also makes money where demand for investment is high but the supply of investment is low. China would constitute a location that meets this criteria.
This is why the global banking system is opposed to borders and wants globalism because the easier it is for banks to take savings from anywhere and shift it to investments anywhere, the higher their profit. A bank's profit interest does not align with any single nation's interest. Right now, China's interest overlaps and the USA is actually losing out due to the bank's interest but things could change one day for China also.
Now how does what the bank is doing impact the USA? Well, when the bank decides to throw American savings at China instead of America, that drives the price investors in America are willing to pay (the price of credit) up which reduces the overall amount of investment in the USA. The net impact of this is reducing the wealth in the USA, while increasing the wealth in China and increasing the banks profit.
Whenever people discuss the problems of the world through the lens of "Zionists", they almost always tend to miss the mark. Zionists aren't inherently bad and in fact Zionists have criticized international banking Jews before also because the interests of international banking Jews didn't necessarily align with the interests of Zionists. This is why you can get a situation where the left and Israel are fighting one another because the global Cathedral as one might call it IS NOT actually fully aligned with Zionism.
Here's a quote by Theodore Herzl who was the Father of Zionism. In this quote he is referring to banker Jews.
Correct but that equilibrium is not as beneficial to the USA then if say the bank didn't shift the savings to China so that the bank had excess savings it needed to invest in the USA (since it can't go to China and we'll ignore all other countries). The banks would start offering credit at extremely low rates to encourage investment to get rid of its excess savings. This would overall reduce the profit of the bank and increase investment in the USA which would be a net benefit to the USA's wealth but the bank's profits would decrease.
Between the two scenarios, the one I just described benefits the USA more.
Without complicating it too much, I will note that the bank's maintain and free market economists etc... that my Scenario 1 (money going to China) leads to greater global wealth and since the banks are owned by Americans, the profits come back to America over the long-term. More wealth in China for example means more potential for trade and the net benefits in the end improve the lives of Americans over the long-term. This is a very idealistic take because it assumes the profit will come back to America and won't just be used on purchases in other countries or to again further invest in other countries. Nothing says the money has to cycle back and with companies now more able to do the work by offshoring in other countries, it doesn't even necessarily lead to more American jobs. Furthermore, there's nothing to say China's increase in wealth will cycle back to the USA either because China can implement trade barriers and perhaps leverage its wealth to get better trade agreements with other countries and actually reduce America's overall wealth even further.
Can you speak on the supposed signs that China has an imminent economic catastrophe on its hand due to being far too overcredited? You're probably familiar with the Peter Zeihan take on this and that is mainly how I am familiar with it.
Honestly, I don't know enough about China's situation trust myself to speculate but my quick take is that almost all their debt is to their own citizens. That means China has a lot of tricks up its sleeve to solve the debt problem. Essentially, they'll just spread out any negative impacts from the debt among all their citizens. The net impact would be reducing the quality of life of the Chinese people but if they spread it out well enough it might have relatively little total impact.
The debt is likely not good for the Chinese people. I have a hard time believing a lot of the new debt China has taken on has actually had net positive value add to society as a whole (though it might, I haven't looked into it). But will it be the cause of an imminent economic catastrophe? I doubt it.
This is great; thank you!
It was this thread but I appreciate any discussion on this matter:
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/12jJPzbUSl/military-industrial-complex-gian/c/
Watching with interest. I have my own ideas about banking, international banking as it pertains to the entire history of the US, and what zionism even means. It has a historical definition, and modern usage has gone completely off the rails as to what that term means.
I would love to see this community define that term, whatever you use it to mean. I think that definition (at least) is essential before real discussion of the OP could take place.
This is THE most important issue in all of our lifetimes. Before plannedemic anyway. Many also being affected by plannedriots. Some would say that's all just diversion to keep us from focusing on THE one issue that matters ...
“ Watching with interest. I have my own ideas about banking, international banking as it pertains to the entire history of the US, and what zionism even means. It has a historical definition, and modern usage has gone completely off the rails as to what that term means.”
Would you care to elaborate on your ideas for the sake of discussion?
“ I would love to see this community define that term, whatever you use it to mean. I think that definition (at least) is essential before real discussion of the OP could take place.”
Maybe I’m wrong but I’m not sure the term is even relevant. From what I understand we have a cabal ruling the planet through the monetary system and they happen to all be Jewish. Call it what you will; it is what it is.
“This is THE most important issue in all of our lifetimes. Before plannedemic anyway. Many also being affected by plannedriots. Some would say that's all just diversion to keep us from focusing on THE one issue that matters ...“
I said to someone today that Covid is the most significant event in human history: the intentional release of a man made virus followed by an experiment on the entire human population.
What is the one issue that really matters? The monetary system?
Yes, the monetary system. There are 2 likely entry points into the discussion, 1913 and funding people leaving Europe to come to our colonies.
Creating the Fed in 1913 was completely illegal. The purpose was to break the US populace such that we'd willingly forfeit everything the Nation ever stood for in exchange for some gibs. Preferably without a shot being fired but by 1950 it was stated in Congress that they will have One World Government (OWG) whether voluntarily or by force.
Feudalism is the goal. They are creating a sub-species to be easier to control, along with a huge technological gap. Easy to achieve if EMP knocks out all power and it's never restored. Also why the emphasis on white man bad. All resources controlled by as few as possible. Their knights / enforcers are primarily the 3 letters. Everybody's focused on cops but they'll mainly be trying to defend their own families and homes.
So if you can't breathe, or are facing an angry mob, yeah you have immediate concerns. These are diversionary tactics, like polarizing society to get Americans to hate Americans for every reason imaginable.
Our answer is E Pluribus Unum.
Back to our colonial era, people with enough money to own ships, buy stores etc wanted to escape "the corrupt European banking system." At the time that was Rothschilds. They were and remain JINOS. Even their Jewish ancestry is suspect. Not all who own the Fed, IMF, BIS etc are Jews. Some are Arabs, some are Chinese etc. Its about power, not religion. Jews are severely over-represented among the elite, it's true. But they don't practice the religion.
We only lose if we don't fight. This Nation stopped fighting this problem in 1913.
if the jews were not present, we could overcome the evil men of our own race. the evil men of our own race may seek their own profit at the expense of the rest of us, but they do not seek to destroy our race. only the jews seek that.
Have you ever met a Jew? You should be able to kick the ass of any 10 of them, simultaneously. They are irrelevant, sissy boy
it is not the frail body of the kike i fear, nor their conniving tongue which i see through, but my many brethren which have fallen victim to his deceit and turned against themselves
Thanks for your insights. You’ve probably read Creature From Jekyll Island. These are not simple concepts to grasp, i.e. fractional reserve banking and international monetary policy. I feel like most people don’t have the intellectual capacity to understand this stuff even if they wanted to (which most do not which is the main problem).
What is the thing you mention of funding people to come to the colonies?
Why do they want feudalism - just the obvious nature of a power structure superbly in their favor? Don’t they already have all the power anyways?
I’ve mentioned this before, but it seems pretty stupid to me if you have all the wealth and power you destroy all the beautiful places (Europe). Why not just enjoy your money?
Yes I have read Creature From Jekyll Island! Wish I could have begun my journey into learning about this by reading that book, it wouldve been SO much easier! Should be required reading, IMHO. For anyone reading this that's unfamiliar, start with the bibliography and see how much research went into this incredible work.
Anyone can understand "the mandrake equation," if not the drier details.
Every trip across the Atlantic took extraordinary wealth, especially at first. You had to bring enough with you to survive once you arrived. That stress decreased when you could land at an established port city. The motivation for this was identical to what we all need to be doing now, fighting the corrupt banking system. It's synonymous with US history! With the exception of 1913 til now.
What about what I said in terms of how do we fight it when we can’t get people interested in understanding it and even if they want to they genuinely may not have the intellectual capacity to understand it?
I didn't address the elites very much. Even just in terms of our Fed, it makes sense for them to be content milking their cash cow and staying in the shadows. Personally, I think DJT must have been up to something that could actually challenge them. I have read claims that our US Treasury and the Fed are no longer separate and that Black Rock is in control of all of it. I don't know the truth of any of that, nor do I know how to check. It just makes sense to me that they needed a reason to come out in the open.
IMHO this is bigger than one US election, although having DJT's head on their wall as a trophy, being the last duly elected POTUS is an added bonus. With a built-in safety measure that even if they lost in 2020, they still had 2024. Clearly the elite's goal of taking possession of everything, the great reset, is closer with DJT out of the WH.
Why feudalism? It's good to be King. Get everybody fighting over capitalism vs communism as a diversion. Although the transition may well look like the communist takeover so many here fear. Or even a Chinese communist takeover.
Communists are the more immediate threat, regardless. Even if there does exist an elite cabal pulling strings from thirty thousand feet, it's still a communist pulling you out of your house and lining you up on your knees.
Nobody's tried that on me yet no matter how bad I'm itching for it.
The cabal has had us all as slaves our entire working lives.
Thanks. Please let me know if you find anything about BLACKROCK I can look at. Save my username and dm me if you could.
What videos do you generally recommend to learn more about what’s actually going on/happened? FYI money masters is like a video version of creature from Jekyll island; it’s what originally red pilled me about the monetary system.
I was going to say that one :) It's look, but not as long s the book. It goes in more of a chronological order, and is less US centered.
The end goal of power pursuits is to become a god. It seems stupid to you because the concept of becoming a god also probably seems stupid at face value. Feudalism is the most reliable form of control structure to keep the 80% of the population that are mindless automatons most efficiently under thumb
I think nothing can be more important for those on the right than distinguishing between International banker Jews and other Jews. People tend to think in all or nothing terms; either there is no Jewish conspiracy or Hitler was right. Just like all groups of people, Jews are not all the same.
Its pointless to try and make that argument. As you correctly stated, the vast majority is not capable of critical thinking.
Good point.