In the sense that there would have been no October revolution without Lenin. But have Lenin agitate in a country with different conditions, and he would have gone absolutely nowhere. The point is that social conditions matter most of all.
I never said one man was responsible, just a driving force. The USA's special agencies testing and spreading drugs during the 60-70's were a large factor as well when it comes to societal change. Of course the media and news as well, on what they decided to cover and how it was done.
One man cannot create a revolution.
Didn't Lenin and Guevara get pretty close?
In the sense that there would have been no October revolution without Lenin. But have Lenin agitate in a country with different conditions, and he would have gone absolutely nowhere. The point is that social conditions matter most of all.
Sure, fair enough.
I never said one man was responsible, just a driving force. The USA's special agencies testing and spreading drugs during the 60-70's were a large factor as well when it comes to societal change. Of course the media and news as well, on what they decided to cover and how it was done.