The major focus looks to be about abortion on demand and contraceptives and pads for girls. Although no one proved it is an issue in the first place.
Parliament encourages member states to ensure sexuality education is taught comprehensively to primary and secondary school children, as SRHR education can significantly contribute to reducing sexual violence and harassment.
This part needs explanation cause I do not understand how abortion services decrease infant mortality
safe abortion services are important elements in saving women’s lives and reducing infant and child mortality.
It's not language for the rational, critical thinking individual. Anyone who has above-room temperature I.Q., can see it for what it is: child grooming.
For the normies, the idiots, and the "allies" unwilling to parent correctly, it's weasel words designed expressly to appeal to emotion. A fallacy most normies aren't prone to pick up on and will eat it up just like some of them are convinced that they should be okay with all the interracial agitprop in media because being against it might get them labeled as a "racist".
In this case, it's legislation that linguistically foists upon them the obligation to accept... "being gay is okay because otherwise you're a bigot who condones rape culture!".
Any parent worth their salt should pull their kid from school and teach them about all the ills that come with the Rainbow Reich society. But I fear that there are far and few between willing to do so these days.