A group of people are being charged a different amount for a service than a different group of people, based on their skin tone.
Upon their review, this practice of charging different prices to people based on race is considered fair and just practice within the jurisdiction of Seattle.
Why is there an issue here? Clearly they're just free market absolutists. LGBTQIAMAP2S+ events cost more for white people, because the primary demand for such an event is from white people, while some other products, IKEA would say watermelon and fried chicken (and IKEA is never wrong in their wokeness), can cost more for black people to purchase, because the primary demand is higher.
That's just free market absolutism, and it's so nice to see that Seattle has gotten off their commie horse and joined in for it.
That IS the only logical conclusion to their ruling that different prices for difference races is A-OK.
A group of people are being charged a different amount for a service than a different group of people, based on their skin tone.
Upon their review, this practice of charging different prices to people based on race is considered fair and just practice within the jurisdiction of Seattle.
Why is there an issue here? Clearly they're just free market absolutists. LGBTQIAMAP2S+ events cost more for white people, because the primary demand for such an event is from white people, while some other products, IKEA would say watermelon and fried chicken (and IKEA is never wrong in their wokeness), can cost more for black people to purchase, because the primary demand is higher.
That's just free market absolutism, and it's so nice to see that Seattle has gotten off their commie horse and joined in for it.
That IS the only logical conclusion to their ruling that different prices for difference races is A-OK.