Not Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Glenn Loury and everyone else who dissents from the narrative. It's almost as if it's about politics and not race.
Of course, but those exceptions are usually outcasted and labeled as something other than black
Whatever they are 'labeled' as does not negate the fact that these are black, and yet excommunicated. It shows that it is not about just race. Having the right opinions, in their mind, is paramount. If you then also have the right race, then you are untouchable.
And it flips back and forth in a convenient way to allow movement of culture only in one direction that only destroys and never builds or heals.
Completely agree with first two points. The contradictions are on the other side, and are there to further the divide.
My solution is to remove all taboos (ideally for adults only, but this is hard online). Even the dumbest ideas have some source from which they are formed, and I think they get dumber and more stupid the more taboo they become.
Not Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Glenn Loury and everyone else who dissents from the narrative. It's almost as if it's about politics and not race.
Whatever they are 'labeled' as does not negate the fact that these are black, and yet excommunicated. It shows that it is not about just race. Having the right opinions, in their mind, is paramount. If you then also have the right race, then you are untouchable.
Yes, but what's your solution?
Completely agree with first two points. The contradictions are on the other side, and are there to further the divide.
My solution is to remove all taboos (ideally for adults only, but this is hard online). Even the dumbest ideas have some source from which they are formed, and I think they get dumber and more stupid the more taboo they become.