Yeah, I'm aware about most of it, though I'd disagree with your conclusion that human rights don't exist. They do, they just serve to justify imperialism.
As for human rights, they were critiqued by Marx:
Yes, Marx, in his "On the Jewish question" tells us rights only exists in a community-society-democracy-collective. And other things too. All things only exist in socialism, aka "human" rights don't exist, leftist rights do.
Marx, like all leftists, is deluded and lives in a pesudo-reality.
In the end, those ensnared lose the ability to distinguish reality and pseudo-reality almost entirely and become functionally psychopathic, and if they gain enough social, cultural, economic, and political power, they can hold hostage entire societies that are, in effect, on the march to totalitarianism and, eventually, total catastrophic collapse.
Don't believe in stupid things like "human" rights, Santa Claus or the mystic powers of "the US Constitution", a piece of paper.
As for liberals, it does exist insofar that it's a term referring to certain set of beliefs, ideals, and values, all of which are utilized to justify their application in real life, which ends up necessarily different. Certainly, in its ideal form it can exist only in fantasy or fiction, especially due to the notion of individuals, but that's also the case with "free market" and other various ideologies/systems. as a fucking 200 year old lie.
There are no human rights, but there are God given rights. The trick they used to corrupt people is to turn them away from God to focus on man. (selfishness, ego) Thus, human rights were born.
Yes, human rights are meaningless in a secular worldview. Because it always boils down to "my right to speech/life/etc is intrinsic", because they can't say sacred. But what if I don't agree with your assessment of what's intrinsic to human "dignity". And what happens when I have the power to take away your so-called rights? Why shouldn't I? Because you said I'd be evil? Because you deep-down believe they're sacred? Solely because you asserted that I can't? LMAO watch me
If however, you believe their is a higher power, then your appeal to intrinsic rights is logically sound. Because then the violator of your rights will get his in the end. And their punishment will be far worse than anything they could ever deal to you on earth
Rights have to be based on morality, and humans don't know what morality is. We only see glimpses of it that we get from God. That's why we get ridiculous things like the UN announcing that Broadband is a basic human right.
If it doesn't come from God, then where does it come from? What makes it valid? I think the founders of America had a better understanding of God than most people do today. At least they were talking about the right things.
And you are right, these evil people will be judged in the end, and not by me.
From a libertarians perspective, both hate individualism and freedom, and so look similar. She is wrong though. They are not fundamentally the same. They have real diffierences and they build on different core values.
You're confusing the point being made, which is that within society it does exist and has immense power behind it, which if left at "x doesn't exist" ignores that.
Yes, Marx, in his "On the Jewish question" tells us rights only exists in a community-society-democracy-collective. And other things too. All things only exist in socialism, aka "human" rights don't exist, leftist rights do.
Marx, like all leftists, is deluded and lives in a pesudo-reality.
https://archive.vn/smjeB https://newdiscourses.com/2021/01/nature-pseudo-reality/
Don't believe in stupid things like "human" rights, Santa Claus or the mystic powers of "the US Constitution", a piece of paper.
There are no human rights, but there are God given rights. The trick they used to corrupt people is to turn them away from God to focus on man. (selfishness, ego) Thus, human rights were born.
Yes, human rights are meaningless in a secular worldview. Because it always boils down to "my right to speech/life/etc is intrinsic", because they can't say sacred. But what if I don't agree with your assessment of what's intrinsic to human "dignity". And what happens when I have the power to take away your so-called rights? Why shouldn't I? Because you said I'd be evil? Because you deep-down believe they're sacred? Solely because you asserted that I can't? LMAO watch me
If however, you believe their is a higher power, then your appeal to intrinsic rights is logically sound. Because then the violator of your rights will get his in the end. And their punishment will be far worse than anything they could ever deal to you on earth
Rights have to be based on morality, and humans don't know what morality is. We only see glimpses of it that we get from God. That's why we get ridiculous things like the UN announcing that Broadband is a basic human right.
If it doesn't come from God, then where does it come from? What makes it valid? I think the founders of America had a better understanding of God than most people do today. At least they were talking about the right things.
And you are right, these evil people will be judged in the end, and not by me.
She’s not wrong.
From a libertarians perspective, both hate individualism and freedom, and so look similar. She is wrong though. They are not fundamentally the same. They have real diffierences and they build on different core values.
Leftism is totalitarianism.
Santa Claus man.