The lack of liability is what gets me. If you're confident in your product, why do you need it? Voided liability makes no sense. Limited liability, I could see: People drop dead all the time and greedy vultures will label the cause of death whatever profits themselves most, so sure, SOME protections when someone crashes their bike and the family calls Vaxx Car Craxx. Some sanity barriers pre-emptively put in place to minimalize legal cost to the company. But complete immunity, even if it is traceable and provably related?
If someone shows up to a protest in a hazmat suit with a flamethrower, you don't assume they're just there for purely necessary minimal self-defense. Overprotection is highly suspect. You don't wear a full suit of armor to a carnival, even if it is purely "defensive" armor that will never need to be used. And you don't give Big Pharma blanket protections when merely "proved due diligence" protections would do.
The lack of liability is what gets me. If you're confident in your product, why do you need it? Voided liability makes no sense. Limited liability, I could see: People drop dead all the time and greedy vultures will label the cause of death whatever profits themselves most, so sure, SOME protections when someone crashes their bike and the family calls Vaxx Car Craxx. Some sanity barriers pre-emptively put in place to minimalize legal cost to the company. But complete immunity, even if it is traceable and provably related?
If someone shows up to a protest in a hazmat suit with a flamethrower, you don't assume they're just there for purely necessary minimal self-defense. Overprotection is highly suspect. You don't wear a full suit of armor to a carnival, even if it is purely "defensive" armor that will never need to be used. And you don't give Big Pharma blanket protections when merely "proved due diligence" protections would do.