It's really hard to start a post like this, so I'll just jump into it.
The reason why companies keep lurching to the left cannot be solely some grand elite agenda, because there's no way somebody invited Devolver Digital or some of the other low-tier names that went hard left to the supposed Great Reset meetings.
So why do they do it? Simple. We have short memories, accept apologies too easily and don't double down. They, on the other hand, have the MeToo movement to cancel people who cross them, they boycott effectively and easily due to a lack of targets and they always remember trivial details of when and how people stepped over their line.
Look at the thread about the Five Nights at Freddie's guy, his politics wasn't openly stated, but they tracked down his beliefs and went to war.
I know people are going to say "Why should we take a lecture from someone who buys from CCP-owned Epic Games", but attacking me doesn't make this shit less true.
We need clear red lines. We need an actual maintained and permanent list of companies that crossed us. I made the Female Supremacy Day Shame List 2021, but that's just a start, and I'm sure people disagree with me attacking even the most basic gestures towards that movement as unforgivable, so I don't believe I'd be the best person to be managing the actual list.
Regarding short memories, I completely agree. We need a better record of all the stunts that people and organizations have pulled, and use it to build a coherent case against them. Now it's just 3 minutes of outrage that just blows over with no lasting damage to their reputation.
Accepting apologies is a two-edged sword. If you want to deter people from going over from your own side or neutral to theirs, then you need to refuse to accept apologies - thereby saying that if you decide to pull any crap, you're in the dumps forever. But if you're trying to gain people from the other side, then accepting apologies can be quite helpful, as it incentivizes people to come over to you.
I know you think that I favor 'forgiving' people out of some sort of misguided principle, but for me, it's really all expediency. Right now, we would need people to join us. Once we are strong enough to defeat them with the then-current constellation of forces, there will be no need for it. And frankly, people so diehard in nonsense do deserve anathematization.
Insofar as they do have a lack of targets, it is because they do accept a surrender/apology. They can focus all their demented energy on one target, because they move on from the prior case that surrendered.
The issue is that we don't really have a good line of attack that is as effective as their 'ism' smears.
What my recommendation would be for you is what I actually do myself. When you see something that you don't like, like celebrating International Women's History Century or something, find something that other people will care about. Then use that in your attack. Whenever I see a SJW, I try to always search for 'nigga' and 'nigger', because I know they can figuratively die by that sword, and a lot of them used it in the early 2010s. That needs to be archived.
So when the time is opportune, it can be used against them.
The issue is that there are too many of them. I'm fine with trying to boycott them, but it's unrealistic to expect it from the average right-winger, let alone the average person. There's no way people are even going to remember that list.
As you said, they attack one target at a time. When you have made an example of one company, that will add credibility to your attacks, and make future companies fearful. The best course of action would be to pick one company that is a really bad offender, and which has a clientele that would not like that, and then bring that to light until the company surrenders.
But when you have a surrender, you also have to forgive, because otherwise there is no point in surrendering for the company. If you want people to do what you want, which is what we want at the moment, you have to leave them a path for retreat. Particularly since destroying a company like Gillette is not really feasible at the moment. (Though I have to say that I don't follow my own advice and wouldn't buy Gillette even if it apologized. I would stop attacking it.)