Because the good king can die and be replaced by a bad king and then that king gets replaced by another bad king ad nauseam until someone decides monarchy isn't a good system and is worth overthrowing.
We don't get to have a good king before being plunged into never ending hell? Or maybe we just passed that phase long ago and the scenario is the same except now we get to have the illusion of choice via elections.
Because the good king can die and be replaced by a bad king and then that king gets replaced by another bad king ad nauseam until someone decides monarchy isn't a good system and is worth overthrowing.
And how is that different from the neo-liberal hell that we currently inhabit?
We don't get to have a good king before being plunged into never ending hell? Or maybe we just passed that phase long ago and the scenario is the same except now we get to have the illusion of choice via elections.