We don't need to be 'going faster' than before if we at the 'culmination' do we?
Right. It has nothing to do with “acceleration” or “being worse than before faster than before.” It’s a flat gradient. Tranny normalization differs in literally no way from nonwhite egalitarianism or feminism. Nor even from the implementation of Keynesianism. And that doesn’t differ in magnitude from the income tax or from modern monetary theory. Social and economic changes also don’t differ in weight from governmental ones. The Goldstein pornography trial is a step equivalent to Roe v. Wade. is a step equivalent to the 19th amendment is a step equivalent to the National Firearms Act is a step equivalent to HR 1 (2021). They are all equivalent in value. Nothing is any “faster” and each of the steps isn’t “worse” than the previous.
This has been going on for a very, very long time.
No one is waking up. There have never been fewer people in history who knew the truth. Not even going to mention “doing something about it” because fuck if anyone, anywhere is.
[emotional whining]
And yet you’re incapable of refuting a word I’ve said or proving your own claims or even holding a discussion. Piss the fuck off, kid. Your cowardice in the face of merely being told about a genocide is why the genocide continues unabated.
Oh, by the way, it’s not accelerating either. They’ve been working on this for 5,800 years. They’re not going to rush the last 200. They are more patient than you are.
Cute, enjoy your delusions, I guess. Next you’ll whine about how “people will have totally had enough soon!” and will therefore “do something about it, just you wait and see!” like the rest of the brain damaged hope addicts who have no comprehension of history.
PBS did not have drag queen story time on back in the 1990s. This is a fact
They did have diversity storytime, though. Did anyone do anything about that? No. Did anyone do anything about the drag queens? No.
Gee.
These are huge and significant changes to what kids are being introduced to today
Yeah, see, I already covered that, though. They’re not huge, they’re not significant, and they’re not changes. They’re merely a continuation, of the same magnitude, of everything that was already happening. And which you’re inexplicably ignoring. And that’s interesting, but I’ll never get an explanation from you for that, so oh well.
Again, this is an irrefutable fact. You have nothing to refute this.
Good thing no one questioned it, you illiterate fucking retard! No one said this, fuckstick. Learn how to fucking read.
Pride back in the 1990s was not a month-long media fest to retcon popular characters or flagrantly promote degeneracy 24/7 across every major news and media outlet.
Lol, “Black history month.” Again, you’re not reading my posts. At all. You have no idea that I’ve already bypassed the “argument” you’re trying to make here.
There were no year-long riots being promoted and funded by the ZOG and Chicoms.
First, you’re going to be banned for saying that, since you can’t say it on this board. They’re very clear about that. Second, I guess you think that the Civil Rights Movement was totally an organic protest and absolutely had no communist or jewish funding (but I repeat myself) from any internal or external sources of power… right?
Yes, there were riots back then but no one called them "peaceful"
I literally just mentioned the hippie movement.
and people sure as heck weren't being brainwashed to see billions of dollars of destruction as a good thing.
Hmm. I guess we best the shit out of the blacks and killed or deported them all, because we didn’t see the civil rights movement as a “good thing” which was “justified”, right?
OH WAIT NO, WE CREATED AN ENTIRE ECONOMIC SYSTEM TO PROP THEM UP AND PRIORITIZED THEIR EDUCATION AND HIRING OVER OUR OWN SOLELY TO CAPITULATE TO THEM AND GIVE THEM EVERYTHING THEY RIOTED OVER. JUST. LIKE. TODATY.
Given how ignorant you are, you'll try to align the L.A., riots from 1992 to the year-long destruction caused by BLM/Antifa
The years-long destruction of the civil rights movement, but sure, your single year of summertime niggery is totally “unprecedented” and has “never” happened before and things are “getting worse faster than ever”, no, see, it’s whatever you claim reality is like; ignore everything that happened before you were born.
which will not only further reveal how uneducated you are but also further prove how young you are.
Project harder, illiterate.
Movies still starred straight white males in masculine roles
Lol, sure thing; all those nonwhites all over the media totally didn’t exist.
The only time you saw glomohomos appear in 90s films was as comic relief side characters and no one took them seriously.
Clearly they did, though, since faggots got their legalization, just like their puppet masters wanted. You can’t make that claim, because it totally undermines the overarching argument you’re (failing) to make. Either no one took them seriously and faggots have no power… or you’re lying, because faggots have institutional power now.
I don't even need to explain how video games were so much more intuitive and constantly evolving back in the 90s. We went from 8-bit digitized platformers to full-on open-world 3D games within the span of just a decade. Majority of action games back then all starred masculine, straight-white males kicking butt and taking names, from Doom Guy to Duke Nukem to BioMenace to Judge Dredd to Lethal Weapon to Corridor 7 to Ken's Labyrinth to Hugo's House of Horrors 3D. There was no shortage of awesome video games made for men. These days you're lucky to find a straight, white masculine lead in an AAA game, and even so expect him to be surrounded by trannies, groids, and all other forms of degeneracy.
Right. That’s not even relevant to the topic.
pro wrestling
They have faggots there now?
you're too stupid to understand anything anyone is writing.
That’s some cute irony, kiddo. Keep up the illiteracy.
Now go on and respond with your bull-crap about Jewish subversion being around for eons and none of us were aware of it
Nice strawman.
even though everyone is already aware
Oh wow, I guess that means all the problems they caused are solved, right? Because people are aware now? And, you know, not allowing it?
Or wait, no, hmm… the exact opposite of that is true. How about that.
we're talking about how the mainstream zeitgeist has changed drastically from the 90s to today.
Mhmm, it didn’t. You didn’t read (can you read?) and so you keep repeating things that are irrelevant or false. I already explained how you are objectively wrong. It has nothing to do with “acceleration” or “being worse than before faster than before.” It’s a flat gradient. Tranny normalization differs in literally no way from nonwhite egalitarianism or feminism. Nor even from the implementation of Keynesianism. And that doesn’t differ in magnitude from the income tax or from modern monetary theory. Social and economic changes also don’t differ in weight from governmental ones. The Goldstein pornography trial is a step equivalent to Roe v. Wade. is a step equivalent to the 19th amendment is a step equivalent to the National Firearms Act is a step equivalent to HR 1 (2021). They are all equivalent in value. Nothing is any “faster” and each of the steps isn’t “worse” than the previous.
This has been going on for a very, very long time.
The collapse of civilization is complete. The purchasing power of the US dollar is worth less than one cent compared to the dollar of 1913. Taxes? Where do we start. ✡Income tax✡, which exists solely to pay for the existence of the Federal Reserve–going to the pockets of private individuals for the ‘privilege’ of printing worthless currency. An unconstitutional marxist welfare state to steal more income from the working and give it to the lazy, the nonwhites, and the foreigners. Endless war solely for the sake of other nations with no annexations or financial benefits for the US, wasting trillions in taxes and tens of thousands of lives. All laws, everywhere, at every level, are completely ignored by the government. The governing class is universally guilty of multiple felonies, and at least half of whom are guilty of outright treason. Genocidal invasion from the third world. Rape, murder, theft, etc. running rampant throughout once-safe streets as niggers and dune coons reap the fruits of their invasion. Terrorist attacks against people who are imprisoned for fighting back against the terrorists. Faggots and trannies holding parades where they spew their juices riddled with incurable STDs all over the streets. You get fired from your job or arrested if you so much as disagree with this. And gun confiscations from actual citizens so they can’t even defend themselves against any of it or reverse it. NOT THAT THEY EVER WILL. And that’s the problem. One hundred years of this. Never stopping, never slowing. 8And what have the people done? NOTHING. They didn’t rise up in:
1913 when the US stopped using gold and silver as money and started using private paper currency.
1917 when the jew puppet Wilson said, “We’re going to war in Europe and getting nothing out of it in return.”
1920 when jewish feminists brainwashed men into granting women the vote, setting a deadline on the collapse of our nation (every civilization in human history that enfranchised women fell within roughly 100 years).
1933 when FDR unconstitutionally made “owning gold” illegal.
1934 when the National Firearms Act unconstitutionally banned the ownership of weapons.
1935 when the marxist Social Security Act was passed, nor during any of other FDR’s illegal acts.
1941 when the jew puppet FDR said, “We’re going to war in Europe, again, and getting nothing out of it in return, again.”
1946 when Bretton Woods was signed.
1950 when the Korean War removed all pretense for reasons for the US going to war–and with no legal declaration.
1955 when the US paid 100% of Laos’ military budget for its own civil war, without anything in return and without taxpayers’ consent.
1959 when the Vietnam War saw its first direct US involvement, again with no legal declaration.
1965 when the Immigration & Nationality Act openly committed genocide on Americans. THE POLITICIANS ADMITTED THE PURPOSE OF THE BILL WAS TO COMMIT GENOCIDE ON WHITES. No one did anything.
1965 when the US intervened in the Dominican War, again without declaration.
1967 when the USS Liberty was attacked by Israel for the sole purpose of getting the US to attack Egypt for the jews’ sake.
1968 when the Civil Rights Act unconstitutionally destroyed freedom of association and whites were forced at gunpoint to allow niggers into their schools.
1973 when Roe v. Wade legalized murder of the innocent, and when the US defended Israel in the Yom Kippur War after Israel literally threatened the US with nuclear hellfire.
The 1980s when the US was exposed as deposing democracies and installing dictators.
1990 when the first Gulf War began the march for Greater Israel.
2001 after 9/11 when jews attacked the United States, yet again for Greater Israel.
2003 when the Second Gulf War was declared. Nor when it was proven the war was carried out under false pretenses. Nor when any of the post-Cold War wars STILL failed to get us land or reparations, and we paid TRILLIONS MORE to rebuild our enemies.
2008 when the economy collapsed and the banks were given trillions of dollars to give bonuses to their executives who caused it.
2010 when Obamacare ran roughshod over the Constitution.
2015 when faggot “marriage” became “legal.”
2018 when trannies became accepted as “normal.”
2019 when CPS confirmed that children stripping at faggot clubs “isn’t” child abuse, or when a jury ruled that children can be forcibly castrated.
2020 when the entire world obeyed a lockdown for a smaller threat than SARS, the Keynesians stole 6 trillion more from our future, niggers destroyed our cities worse than the riots of the 1960s, and the United States presidential election was publicly stolen without even trying to hide it.
Explain why people will magically start fighting back now, after all of this.
Thanks for the personal attacks AND having no actual argument, though! Bye.
It took you a whole 24 hours to come up with a copy/pasta reply that didn't address anything I wrote, and then you go off on a non-sequitur tangent doing exactly what I said you would do. Here's the obligatory "LOL" because you were too angry to comprehend anything I wrote.
So let me further humiliate you just so you can seethe some more in your next reply (and also because you're out of copy/pasta and I'm curious how your angsty, sweaty fingers will conjure up anything other than dismissals and fallacies.)
So first of all...
They did have diversity storytime, though. Did anyone do anything about that? No. Did anyone do anything about the drag queens? No.
There was nothing called "diversity story time", and teaching kids alphabets and how to count is a league removed from having drag queens and trannies on the show. Just as I said, you had nothing to refute this point, because in the 90s there were no trannies or fags being promoted on PBS or any of their shows.
Thanks for proving you're the angsty /pol/tard 20-something-year-old I said you were since you have no clue what was on PBS back in the 90s (you weren't even born yet. You were just a seething little speck in your dad's tiny sack, waiting to burst out into the world and rage against the machine on 4chan during the aughts).
They’re not huge, they’re not significant, and they’re not changes. They’re merely a continuation, of the same magnitude, of everything that was already happening. And which you’re inexplicably ignoring. And that’s interesting, but I’ll never get an explanation from you for that, so oh well.
They are huge and they are changes. Story time about numbers/letters > gay/trannies teaching kids about Rainbow Reich nonsense.
What you're talking about is called the slippery slope, son. It's been around for ages. What the OP wrote about -- and what you fail to grasp due to your low I.Q., -- is that he's saying the slippery slope has led us to a point where what's on today and what's being taught to kids today is worse than what was on in the 1990s.
Do. You. Understand. Now?
There has never not been a time where subversion or clandestine methods by power-seeking scoundrels were not being employed to direct and/or control the destiny of man. It's been happening since the dawn of mankind.
It's cute that you just learned about Machiavellian methods and how they disrupt social standards. You might want to read The Prince to better understand how this has been going on for far longer than 1913, though.
It still doesn't detract from the point that the slippery slope has led us to a point where things are objectively worse now (trannies on kids shows) than before (no trannies on kids shows).
In order for your fallacious statements to have any weight, the burden of proof is on you to objectively prove that there were trannies on kids shows (specifically PBS) back in the 1990s. You can't because you weren't born back then and the channel didn't allow for that kind of degeneracy back in the 1990s.
As I said before, the PBS example is an irrefutable fact. It just is.
Good thing no one questioned it, you illiterate fucking retard! No one said this, fuckstick. Learn how to fucking read.
Yes, you did. You said that things never changed. They have. If they didn't change then Blues Clues and Arthur and every other PBS show back in the 1990s would have featured globohomo content. They didn't.
You talk about learning how to read but you didn't even read OP's point about it being better in the 90s because degeneracy was not running rampant. The PBS example is proof of that.
Let me break it down for you because you seem to have a really tough time comprehending basic cause and effect.
PBS in the 1990s did not have globohomo propaganda.
PBS in the 2020s contains globohomo propaganda.
That feeds into the OP's point about the 90s being better.
Lol, “Black history month.” Again, you’re not reading my posts. At all. You have no idea that I’ve already bypassed the “argument” you’re trying to make here.
Non-sequitur. Black history month in the 1990s didn't promote gays and degeneracy all month long.
You're really racking up the logical fallacies, kid, all while proving me right about everything I said about you in my original comment.
I literally just mentioned the hippie movement.
That was the 1960s/1970s, ace. We're talking about the 1990s.
You're off on another tangent.
If this were a scorecard you would be in the negative zone by now with how many fallacies you're committing.
The years-long destruction of the civil rights movement, but sure, your single year of summertime niggery is totally “unprecedented” and has “never” happened before and things are “getting worse faster than ever”, no, see, it’s whatever you claim reality is like; ignore everything that happened before you were born.
Stay on topic, ace. We're talking about the 1990s, not the 1960s.
No one brought that up, no one mentioned the 1960 riots. We're talking about 1990s.
Do you understand? Can you comprehend the point the OP is making about today versus the 1990s and not the 1960s?
As I said, you need to stop being emotional like a 'groid. It's unbecoming to the conversation and sending you in wild directions like a feces-flinging ape.
Lol, sure thing; all those nonwhites all over the media totally didn’t exist.
Another non-sequitur. No one said non-whites were not in the movies. The statement I made is true: majority of films starred straight, white males in the 1990s.
It's another irrefutable fact. You could almost name on a hand or two how many mainstream blockbusters starred minorities back in the 1990s, and most were spread out over the course of the decade. I'll even help you out:
Independence Day - Will Smith
Men In Black - Will Smith
Rumble in the Bronx - Jackie Chan
Romeo Must Die - Jet Li
Passenger 57 - Wesley Snipes
Blade - Wesley Snipes
You're welcome. Now you'll be struggling to sift through the net to get more info about the 1990s because, as I said before, you weren't even one of the droplets that your dad spilled onto the floor during his youth at that point while he was jacking off to posters of Pamela Anderson while waiting for 50kb photos of Cindy Margolis to download on his 28.8kbps baud rate modem.
Clearly they did, though, since faggots got their legalization, just like their puppet masters wanted. You can’t make that claim, because it totally undermines the overarching argument you’re (failing) to make. Either no one took them seriously and faggots have no power… or you’re lying, because faggots have institutional power now.
They didn't get their major power grab until the aughts, ace.
We're talking about the 1990s. Keep up.
Right. That’s not even relevant to the topic.
Yes, it is. Because OP said the 1990s were better than the 2010s/2020s/[current year] and he's right. The video games prove his point and my point: gaming wasn't converged with Left-wing degeneracy at that point. Pop-culture saw gaming as a nerdy pastime filled with a lot of uber-masculine heroes and violent media, laced with tons of sexy ladies. That's an irrefutable fact.
Some Left-wing journalists still complain about the "sexism" and "toxic masculinity" from the yesteryears of gaming. It not only further proves my point, but also shows you have no grasp on past or recent history.
As I said before, NONE of that was common or promoted in wrestling back in the 1990s. The closest was Golddust, who was used as a sexually-themed villain, but even then he was married to Terri Runnels, and no one made it seem like it was supposed to be good to be a sexual deviant like Golddust.
Nice strawman.
Except you literally did an entire copy/pasta about it. Thanks again for proving me right.
How does it feel to know everything I predicted you would say, you said it without fail and then failed to say it in a way that didn't make you seem the least bit out of touch and ignorant about everything everyone else mentioned about the 1990s being better than the current era?
Oh wow, I guess that means all the problems they caused are solved, right? Because people are aware now? And, you know, not allowing it?
Talk about a strawman. People being aware =/= being doing something about it.
Mhmm, it didn’t. You didn’t read (can you read?) and so you keep repeating things that are irrelevant or false
Nope. Nothing I said was false. All backed up by facts. You on the other hand? Jeez, I could run the gamut of words to describe a lot of things about you but none of them would be pretty or helpful, so I just won't say anything at all about that.
It has nothing to do with “acceleration” or “being worse than before faster than before.” It’s a flat gradient.
First off, I never said that. You did. Second of all, it's called a slippery slope, and that's what's been happening for years.
It's a step-by-step process. We didn't go from gays/trannies attempting to get normalization in the 1980s to a year later gays getting married and trannies being foisted upon kids in children media. That would be a flat gradient (I suspect you picked this term up from some numbskull on /pol/ who was either having a go at you for being ignorant or you're just too daft to understand what a flat gradient is).
What we've seen transpire over the last 30 - 40 years has been gradual. There were decades between the attempt to have conversations about gays/trannies to actual gay marriage being forcibly legalized through the courts after the proposals were shot down on the legislative level. So no, it's not a flat gradient as evident by the process of time it took for them to reach this point. It took years, and a lot of boiling the frog techniques to get here, even against the wishes of the people, hence why they had to circumvent the democratic republic to attain their goals, because people were not okay with the slippery slope they saw being employed by the Rainbow Reich. We slid right on down that slope to where we are today, and it's a vastly different landscape than what it was in the 1990s.
That's why you couldn't refute any of my points and reverted to ad hominems, non-sequiturs, unessential tangents, and strawmen. Then you went and copy/pasta'd all over yourself like a typical /pol/pot.
Now go on and seethe like a raging child in your next reply, get angsty and start throwing up all sorts of memes or whatever it is you kids do when you lose an argument. I'll simply reply calmly and with facts, and end my comment like I said I would with a hearty "LOL".
Right. It has nothing to do with “acceleration” or “being worse than before faster than before.” It’s a flat gradient. Tranny normalization differs in literally no way from nonwhite egalitarianism or feminism. Nor even from the implementation of Keynesianism. And that doesn’t differ in magnitude from the income tax or from modern monetary theory. Social and economic changes also don’t differ in weight from governmental ones. The Goldstein pornography trial is a step equivalent to Roe v. Wade. is a step equivalent to the 19th amendment is a step equivalent to the National Firearms Act is a step equivalent to HR 1 (2021). They are all equivalent in value. Nothing is any “faster” and each of the steps isn’t “worse” than the previous.
This has been going on for a very, very long time.
No one is waking up. There have never been fewer people in history who knew the truth. Not even going to mention “doing something about it” because fuck if anyone, anywhere is.
And yet you’re incapable of refuting a word I’ve said or proving your own claims or even holding a discussion. Piss the fuck off, kid. Your cowardice in the face of merely being told about a genocide is why the genocide continues unabated.
Oh, by the way, it’s not accelerating either. They’ve been working on this for 5,800 years. They’re not going to rush the last 200. They are more patient than you are.
Comment Reported for - Rule 16 (under bullet point 3.)
Comment Removed
Cute, enjoy your delusions, I guess. Next you’ll whine about how “people will have totally had enough soon!” and will therefore “do something about it, just you wait and see!” like the rest of the brain damaged hope addicts who have no comprehension of history.
They did have diversity storytime, though. Did anyone do anything about that? No. Did anyone do anything about the drag queens? No.
Gee.
Yeah, see, I already covered that, though. They’re not huge, they’re not significant, and they’re not changes. They’re merely a continuation, of the same magnitude, of everything that was already happening. And which you’re inexplicably ignoring. And that’s interesting, but I’ll never get an explanation from you for that, so oh well.
Good thing no one questioned it, you illiterate fucking retard! No one said this, fuckstick. Learn how to fucking read.
Lol, “Black history month.” Again, you’re not reading my posts. At all. You have no idea that I’ve already bypassed the “argument” you’re trying to make here.
First, you’re going to be banned for saying that, since you can’t say it on this board. They’re very clear about that. Second, I guess you think that the Civil Rights Movement was totally an organic protest and absolutely had no communist or jewish funding (but I repeat myself) from any internal or external sources of power… right?
I literally just mentioned the hippie movement.
Hmm. I guess we best the shit out of the blacks and killed or deported them all, because we didn’t see the civil rights movement as a “good thing” which was “justified”, right?
OH WAIT NO, WE CREATED AN ENTIRE ECONOMIC SYSTEM TO PROP THEM UP AND PRIORITIZED THEIR EDUCATION AND HIRING OVER OUR OWN SOLELY TO CAPITULATE TO THEM AND GIVE THEM EVERYTHING THEY RIOTED OVER. JUST. LIKE. TODATY.
The years-long destruction of the civil rights movement, but sure, your single year of summertime niggery is totally “unprecedented” and has “never” happened before and things are “getting worse faster than ever”, no, see, it’s whatever you claim reality is like; ignore everything that happened before you were born.
Project harder, illiterate.
Lol, sure thing; all those nonwhites all over the media totally didn’t exist.
Clearly they did, though, since faggots got their legalization, just like their puppet masters wanted. You can’t make that claim, because it totally undermines the overarching argument you’re (failing) to make. Either no one took them seriously and faggots have no power… or you’re lying, because faggots have institutional power now.
Right. That’s not even relevant to the topic.
They have faggots there now?
That’s some cute irony, kiddo. Keep up the illiteracy.
Nice strawman.
Oh wow, I guess that means all the problems they caused are solved, right? Because people are aware now? And, you know, not allowing it?
Or wait, no, hmm… the exact opposite of that is true. How about that.
Mhmm, it didn’t. You didn’t read (can you read?) and so you keep repeating things that are irrelevant or false. I already explained how you are objectively wrong. It has nothing to do with “acceleration” or “being worse than before faster than before.” It’s a flat gradient. Tranny normalization differs in literally no way from nonwhite egalitarianism or feminism. Nor even from the implementation of Keynesianism. And that doesn’t differ in magnitude from the income tax or from modern monetary theory. Social and economic changes also don’t differ in weight from governmental ones. The Goldstein pornography trial is a step equivalent to Roe v. Wade. is a step equivalent to the 19th amendment is a step equivalent to the National Firearms Act is a step equivalent to HR 1 (2021). They are all equivalent in value. Nothing is any “faster” and each of the steps isn’t “worse” than the previous.
This has been going on for a very, very long time.
The collapse of civilization is complete. The purchasing power of the US dollar is worth less than one cent compared to the dollar of 1913. Taxes? Where do we start. ✡Income tax✡, which exists solely to pay for the existence of the Federal Reserve–going to the pockets of private individuals for the ‘privilege’ of printing worthless currency. An unconstitutional marxist welfare state to steal more income from the working and give it to the lazy, the nonwhites, and the foreigners. Endless war solely for the sake of other nations with no annexations or financial benefits for the US, wasting trillions in taxes and tens of thousands of lives. All laws, everywhere, at every level, are completely ignored by the government. The governing class is universally guilty of multiple felonies, and at least half of whom are guilty of outright treason. Genocidal invasion from the third world. Rape, murder, theft, etc. running rampant throughout once-safe streets as niggers and dune coons reap the fruits of their invasion. Terrorist attacks against people who are imprisoned for fighting back against the terrorists. Faggots and trannies holding parades where they spew their juices riddled with incurable STDs all over the streets. You get fired from your job or arrested if you so much as disagree with this. And gun confiscations from actual citizens so they can’t even defend themselves against any of it or reverse it. NOT THAT THEY EVER WILL. And that’s the problem. One hundred years of this. Never stopping, never slowing. 8And what have the people done? NOTHING. They didn’t rise up in:
Explain why people will magically start fighting back now, after all of this.
Thanks for the personal attacks AND having no actual argument, though! Bye.
It took you a whole 24 hours to come up with a copy/pasta reply that didn't address anything I wrote, and then you go off on a non-sequitur tangent doing exactly what I said you would do. Here's the obligatory "LOL" because you were too angry to comprehend anything I wrote.
So let me further humiliate you just so you can seethe some more in your next reply (and also because you're out of copy/pasta and I'm curious how your angsty, sweaty fingers will conjure up anything other than dismissals and fallacies.)
So first of all...
There was nothing called "diversity story time", and teaching kids alphabets and how to count is a league removed from having drag queens and trannies on the show. Just as I said, you had nothing to refute this point, because in the 90s there were no trannies or fags being promoted on PBS or any of their shows.
Thanks for proving you're the angsty /pol/tard 20-something-year-old I said you were since you have no clue what was on PBS back in the 90s (you weren't even born yet. You were just a seething little speck in your dad's tiny sack, waiting to burst out into the world and rage against the machine on 4chan during the aughts).
They are huge and they are changes. Story time about numbers/letters > gay/trannies teaching kids about Rainbow Reich nonsense.
What you're talking about is called the slippery slope, son. It's been around for ages. What the OP wrote about -- and what you fail to grasp due to your low I.Q., -- is that he's saying the slippery slope has led us to a point where what's on today and what's being taught to kids today is worse than what was on in the 1990s.
Do. You. Understand. Now?
There has never not been a time where subversion or clandestine methods by power-seeking scoundrels were not being employed to direct and/or control the destiny of man. It's been happening since the dawn of mankind.
It's cute that you just learned about Machiavellian methods and how they disrupt social standards. You might want to read The Prince to better understand how this has been going on for far longer than 1913, though.
It still doesn't detract from the point that the slippery slope has led us to a point where things are objectively worse now (trannies on kids shows) than before (no trannies on kids shows).
In order for your fallacious statements to have any weight, the burden of proof is on you to objectively prove that there were trannies on kids shows (specifically PBS) back in the 1990s. You can't because you weren't born back then and the channel didn't allow for that kind of degeneracy back in the 1990s.
As I said before, the PBS example is an irrefutable fact. It just is.
Yes, you did. You said that things never changed. They have. If they didn't change then Blues Clues and Arthur and every other PBS show back in the 1990s would have featured globohomo content. They didn't.
You talk about learning how to read but you didn't even read OP's point about it being better in the 90s because degeneracy was not running rampant. The PBS example is proof of that.
Let me break it down for you because you seem to have a really tough time comprehending basic cause and effect.
PBS in the 1990s did not have globohomo propaganda.
PBS in the 2020s contains globohomo propaganda.
That feeds into the OP's point about the 90s being better.
Non-sequitur. Black history month in the 1990s didn't promote gays and degeneracy all month long.
You're really racking up the logical fallacies, kid, all while proving me right about everything I said about you in my original comment.
That was the 1960s/1970s, ace. We're talking about the 1990s.
You're off on another tangent.
If this were a scorecard you would be in the negative zone by now with how many fallacies you're committing.
Stay on topic, ace. We're talking about the 1990s, not the 1960s.
No one brought that up, no one mentioned the 1960 riots. We're talking about 1990s.
Do you understand? Can you comprehend the point the OP is making about today versus the 1990s and not the 1960s?
As I said, you need to stop being emotional like a 'groid. It's unbecoming to the conversation and sending you in wild directions like a feces-flinging ape.
Another non-sequitur. No one said non-whites were not in the movies. The statement I made is true: majority of films starred straight, white males in the 1990s.
It's another irrefutable fact. You could almost name on a hand or two how many mainstream blockbusters starred minorities back in the 1990s, and most were spread out over the course of the decade. I'll even help you out: Independence Day - Will Smith Men In Black - Will Smith Rumble in the Bronx - Jackie Chan Romeo Must Die - Jet Li Passenger 57 - Wesley Snipes Blade - Wesley Snipes
You're welcome. Now you'll be struggling to sift through the net to get more info about the 1990s because, as I said before, you weren't even one of the droplets that your dad spilled onto the floor during his youth at that point while he was jacking off to posters of Pamela Anderson while waiting for 50kb photos of Cindy Margolis to download on his 28.8kbps baud rate modem.
They didn't get their major power grab until the aughts, ace.
We're talking about the 1990s. Keep up.
Yes, it is. Because OP said the 1990s were better than the 2010s/2020s/[current year] and he's right. The video games prove his point and my point: gaming wasn't converged with Left-wing degeneracy at that point. Pop-culture saw gaming as a nerdy pastime filled with a lot of uber-masculine heroes and violent media, laced with tons of sexy ladies. That's an irrefutable fact.
Some Left-wing journalists still complain about the "sexism" and "toxic masculinity" from the yesteryears of gaming. It not only further proves my point, but also shows you have no grasp on past or recent history.
As a matter of fact, they do: https://www.outsports.com/2019/7/17/20698098/sonny-kiss-gay-aew-fight-for-the-fallen
https://www.outsports.com/2020/6/9/21284641/sonya-deville-daddy-lgbt-wwe-lesbian-storyline-pride-wrestling-glaad
They even have -gasp- trannies wrestling and pretending to be women: https://www.si.com/wrestling/2019/06/18/aew-nyla-rose-transgender-wrestler-history
As I said before, NONE of that was common or promoted in wrestling back in the 1990s. The closest was Golddust, who was used as a sexually-themed villain, but even then he was married to Terri Runnels, and no one made it seem like it was supposed to be good to be a sexual deviant like Golddust.
Except you literally did an entire copy/pasta about it. Thanks again for proving me right.
How does it feel to know everything I predicted you would say, you said it without fail and then failed to say it in a way that didn't make you seem the least bit out of touch and ignorant about everything everyone else mentioned about the 1990s being better than the current era?
Talk about a strawman. People being aware =/= being doing something about it.
Nope. Nothing I said was false. All backed up by facts. You on the other hand? Jeez, I could run the gamut of words to describe a lot of things about you but none of them would be pretty or helpful, so I just won't say anything at all about that.
First off, I never said that. You did. Second of all, it's called a slippery slope, and that's what's been happening for years.
It's a step-by-step process. We didn't go from gays/trannies attempting to get normalization in the 1980s to a year later gays getting married and trannies being foisted upon kids in children media. That would be a flat gradient (I suspect you picked this term up from some numbskull on /pol/ who was either having a go at you for being ignorant or you're just too daft to understand what a flat gradient is).
What we've seen transpire over the last 30 - 40 years has been gradual. There were decades between the attempt to have conversations about gays/trannies to actual gay marriage being forcibly legalized through the courts after the proposals were shot down on the legislative level. So no, it's not a flat gradient as evident by the process of time it took for them to reach this point. It took years, and a lot of boiling the frog techniques to get here, even against the wishes of the people, hence why they had to circumvent the democratic republic to attain their goals, because people were not okay with the slippery slope they saw being employed by the Rainbow Reich. We slid right on down that slope to where we are today, and it's a vastly different landscape than what it was in the 1990s.
That's why you couldn't refute any of my points and reverted to ad hominems, non-sequiturs, unessential tangents, and strawmen. Then you went and copy/pasta'd all over yourself like a typical /pol/pot.
Now go on and seethe like a raging child in your next reply, get angsty and start throwing up all sorts of memes or whatever it is you kids do when you lose an argument. I'll simply reply calmly and with facts, and end my comment like I said I would with a hearty "LOL".
Comment Reported for: Other
I'm not seeing why I should remove this.
Wow, I don’t live here. Who’d a thunk. Later, dipshit. You’ve admitted everything I said is true.