Socialism is less of a danger than multi-culturalism. I've looked beyond my interest-group ideology (libertarianism) towards what actually makes societies work. Society exists because people set aside their self interest in favor of building the common infrastructure. Now why would anyone do that? They do that because they feel kinship with other members of their society -- even the least able. They do that because they want to set an example for their children and leave to them a foundation. No one can afford to care for the entire world. There has to be an us and a them. The only tie that successfully binds humans is blood.
Call it socialism if you want. The opposite is anarchy and moral decay.
If you concluded that racialism makes societies work instead of human freedom, you are the highest form of idiot.
They do that because they feel kinship with other members of their society -- even the least able.
Yup, and racialism has proven that that has never done that even once. At no time, in the history of politics and nation-building, has a group of people simply put away all of their differences and lived in harmony because there is some tacit genetic relationship between them and another group of people.
It has never happened. Racialism, being a particularly ignorant strand of progresivisim, affiliates people who are genetically dissimilar, and claims that they are all homogeneous to one degree or another culturally, despite literally millennia of them highly similar genetic groups explicitly creating rival tribes, factions, religions, civilizations, empires, countries, and nations.
You have nothing in common with people you claim to be genetically related to, at the scope you're talking about. In the same way that Wayne Brady has literally nothing in common with Shaka Zulu. Literally nothing. No shared language, no shared values, no shared culture, no shared society, no shared history, no family lineage. Nothing. "They're black according to Americans" is the only thing in common between the two.
That is what you are relying on to form a kin based community. That's incredibly stupid.
Race is a worse intertermporal abstraction than even Homo Globo, because at least Globalism promotes a homogeneous culture. Race can't even do that. All your racial collectivism exists to do is allow you to take credit for shit you didn't do, while excusing your own failures for a sense of oppression and victimhood. We wuz kings and shit. It's not good enough. It's not good enough to build a society on. It's not even good enough to build a person on.
Then there's the concept of "feeling kinship", as if families don't have terrible mistrust and conflict with one another. You could only be stupid enough to believe that familial kinship meant anything if you grew up in a sheltered and coddled home, and never experienced anything related to "family court". It turns out, blood isn't thinker than water, and it's damn sure not thicker than money.
That sense of kinship can only exist based on shared values, and amicable relationships. Culture links people. Shared prosperity unites them.
The idiocy of National Socialism destroys both. The Socialist rhetoric inevitably balkanizes people into useful power blocks. A volksgemeinschaft is an a useles term uniting utterly dissimilar people under a racial banner which is defined solely by the leadership of the party and never anyone else under any circumstance.
This is why BLM is a National Socialist organization and it is why they are destroying the lives of Black people, including killing them directly.
There has to be an us and a them.
More idiotic socialism. History is not now, and has never been, a zero sum game.
The opposite is anarchy and moral decay.
Socialism is not the opposite of Socialism. The anarchy and moral decay is the order of Socialism. That can't be fixed with more Socialism. Or even "real" Socialism.
Socialism is less of a danger than multi-culturalism. I've looked beyond my interest-group ideology (libertarianism) towards what actually makes societies work. Society exists because people set aside their self interest in favor of building the common infrastructure. Now why would anyone do that? They do that because they feel kinship with other members of their society -- even the least able. They do that because they want to set an example for their children and leave to them a foundation. No one can afford to care for the entire world. There has to be an us and a them. The only tie that successfully binds humans is blood.
Call it socialism if you want. The opposite is anarchy and moral decay.
If you concluded that racialism makes societies work instead of human freedom, you are the highest form of idiot.
Yup, and racialism has proven that that has never done that even once. At no time, in the history of politics and nation-building, has a group of people simply put away all of their differences and lived in harmony because there is some tacit genetic relationship between them and another group of people.
It has never happened. Racialism, being a particularly ignorant strand of progresivisim, affiliates people who are genetically dissimilar, and claims that they are all homogeneous to one degree or another culturally, despite literally millennia of them highly similar genetic groups explicitly creating rival tribes, factions, religions, civilizations, empires, countries, and nations.
You have nothing in common with people you claim to be genetically related to, at the scope you're talking about. In the same way that Wayne Brady has literally nothing in common with Shaka Zulu. Literally nothing. No shared language, no shared values, no shared culture, no shared society, no shared history, no family lineage. Nothing. "They're black according to Americans" is the only thing in common between the two.
That is what you are relying on to form a kin based community. That's incredibly stupid.
Race is a worse intertermporal abstraction than even Homo Globo, because at least Globalism promotes a homogeneous culture. Race can't even do that. All your racial collectivism exists to do is allow you to take credit for shit you didn't do, while excusing your own failures for a sense of oppression and victimhood. We wuz kings and shit. It's not good enough. It's not good enough to build a society on. It's not even good enough to build a person on.
Then there's the concept of "feeling kinship", as if families don't have terrible mistrust and conflict with one another. You could only be stupid enough to believe that familial kinship meant anything if you grew up in a sheltered and coddled home, and never experienced anything related to "family court". It turns out, blood isn't thinker than water, and it's damn sure not thicker than money.
That sense of kinship can only exist based on shared values, and amicable relationships. Culture links people. Shared prosperity unites them.
The idiocy of National Socialism destroys both. The Socialist rhetoric inevitably balkanizes people into useful power blocks. A volksgemeinschaft is an a useles term uniting utterly dissimilar people under a racial banner which is defined solely by the leadership of the party and never anyone else under any circumstance.
This is why BLM is a National Socialist organization and it is why they are destroying the lives of Black people, including killing them directly.
More idiotic socialism. History is not now, and has never been, a zero sum game.
Socialism is not the opposite of Socialism. The anarchy and moral decay is the order of Socialism. That can't be fixed with more Socialism. Or even "real" Socialism.