Who created the theory isn't important. It's what it's used for. Yes, there are people who get off on the thought of being women. No, this isn't a significant number of people. No, this doesn't explain a phenomenon that almost perfectly tracks the shift of culture towards deifying women.
Zhengli and Yanyi are of course famously male. Covid-19 is also completely natural and was not modified to harm men more at all.
So you have no evidence, as usual? And you shifted the goalposts from '10-year-old' (who would not do something like this for sexual reasons) to 'minor', which invalidates your entire point as a 17-year-old can be expected to do that for sexual reasons?
Good show.
Who created the theory isn't important. It's what it's used for.
AGP was an attempt to deflect blame from feminism onto pornography.
No, this doesn't explain a phenomenon that almost perfectly tracks the shift of culture towards deifying women.
It's almost as if there are other things going on in 'culture' other than the things you exclusively concern yourself with.
And this contradicts your earlier claims that women transition because they believe 'male privilege'. If women are increasingly 'deified', one would expect that number to decrease rather than increase.
As usual, you're good at one thing - contradicting yourself.
Zhengli and Yanyi are of course famously male. Covid-19 is also completely natural and was not modified to harm men more at all.
You're so on the ropes that you try a red herring: "see, try this other crazy claim of mine rather than the ones I'm making here!"
Whatever happened to your $10 bet that women would be exempted from taking the AZ vaccine, by the way? Or your claim that it was part of 'The Genocide'? Seems like the AZ vaccine, which you claimed was "created by women to kill men", did a bad job at that, but a good job at combating the virus... that you also believe was "created by women to kill men".
Using AGP as an explanation for this* was an attempt. Happy now?
Both can simultaneously be true. Remember that boys and girls are treated so differently by society, they basically live in different worlds.
I wasn't doing that. I used it as an example of feminists doing what they do best, telling everyone that they had nothing to do with something they clearly had a lot to do with.
Nonsense, there is plenty of data. Often used by them. For example, one of the advocates had a chart showing that a lot of girls have their breasts removed at age 12 and 13.
Using AGP as an explanation for this* was an attempt. Happy now?
No, because that was not my intent at all.
Both can simultaneously be true. Remember that boys and girls are treated so differently by society, they basically live in different worlds.
You judge something to be true not if there is any empirical evidence for it, but based on whether it is consistent with your narrative. That is the mark of an ideologue.
Clearly, if women mutilate themselves to get 'male privilege', as is your claim, that would decrease and not increase as women are 'increasingly deified' as is also your claim.
I wasn't doing that. I used it as an example of feminists doing what they do best, telling everyone that they had nothing to do with something they clearly had a lot to do with.
First of all, it goes without saying that you never established that those two were feminists, or that this was a bioweapon, let alone your hare-brained claim that it was intentionally altered to literally kill you.
That said, you're making the claim that... people who have done something wrong then try to cover that up? Wow, what great heights of insight.
You aren't seriously going to claim that boys and girls are treated the same...you have to be insane to think that, I don't care what "evidence" says. "Evidence" says Finland is the happiest country, but it's a feminist shithole with a high suicide rate.
I don't see how that logic follows. Boys are told that girls are better than them. Girls are told that boys are oppressing them with male privilege so that they develop that hatred early.
I'm pretty sure it's well established by this point that C19 is not and never has been of natural origin. We just don't have a motive beyond "The CCP did it." which doesn't even make sense, because if they did, why wouldn't it have started in HK? The only motive that makes sense is an ideologically based deliberate release by the lab.
I'm willing to bet most are minors, yes.
Who created the theory isn't important. It's what it's used for. Yes, there are people who get off on the thought of being women. No, this isn't a significant number of people. No, this doesn't explain a phenomenon that almost perfectly tracks the shift of culture towards deifying women.
Zhengli and Yanyi are of course famously male. Covid-19 is also completely natural and was not modified to harm men more at all.
So you have no evidence, as usual? And you shifted the goalposts from '10-year-old' (who would not do something like this for sexual reasons) to 'minor', which invalidates your entire point as a 17-year-old can be expected to do that for sexual reasons?
Good show.
AGP was an attempt to deflect blame from feminism onto pornography.
It's almost as if there are other things going on in 'culture' other than the things you exclusively concern yourself with.
And this contradicts your earlier claims that women transition because they believe 'male privilege'. If women are increasingly 'deified', one would expect that number to decrease rather than increase.
As usual, you're good at one thing - contradicting yourself.
You're so on the ropes that you try a red herring: "see, try this other crazy claim of mine rather than the ones I'm making here!"
Whatever happened to your $10 bet that women would be exempted from taking the AZ vaccine, by the way? Or your claim that it was part of 'The Genocide'? Seems like the AZ vaccine, which you claimed was "created by women to kill men", did a bad job at that, but a good job at combating the virus... that you also believe was "created by women to kill men".
Nobody has any evidence, there's no data.
Using AGP as an explanation for this* was an attempt. Happy now?
Both can simultaneously be true. Remember that boys and girls are treated so differently by society, they basically live in different worlds.
I wasn't doing that. I used it as an example of feminists doing what they do best, telling everyone that they had nothing to do with something they clearly had a lot to do with.
Nonsense, there is plenty of data. Often used by them. For example, one of the advocates had a chart showing that a lot of girls have their breasts removed at age 12 and 13.
No, because that was not my intent at all.
You judge something to be true not if there is any empirical evidence for it, but based on whether it is consistent with your narrative. That is the mark of an ideologue.
Clearly, if women mutilate themselves to get 'male privilege', as is your claim, that would decrease and not increase as women are 'increasingly deified' as is also your claim.
First of all, it goes without saying that you never established that those two were feminists, or that this was a bioweapon, let alone your hare-brained claim that it was intentionally altered to literally kill you.
That said, you're making the claim that... people who have done something wrong then try to cover that up? Wow, what great heights of insight.
Well, there you go. They are kids.
What was your intent then?
You aren't seriously going to claim that boys and girls are treated the same...you have to be insane to think that, I don't care what "evidence" says. "Evidence" says Finland is the happiest country, but it's a feminist shithole with a high suicide rate.
I don't see how that logic follows. Boys are told that girls are better than them. Girls are told that boys are oppressing them with male privilege so that they develop that hatred early.
I'm pretty sure it's well established by this point that C19 is not and never has been of natural origin. We just don't have a motive beyond "The CCP did it." which doesn't even make sense, because if they did, why wouldn't it have started in HK? The only motive that makes sense is an ideologically based deliberate release by the lab.