I'm very bored. Ask me anything you want. Are we even allowed to do this kind of post?
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (100)
sorted by:
They exist, but they become rarer by the day. Most women, at their core, are followers, though. Weak men, and omnipresent media, have allowed the current state of affairs, but it would quickly change if men became strong again, and media influence declined. Both are likely to happen, just because of the current state of affairs is self-destructive to society. Men will be left to pick up the pieces and rebuild, and that's okay.
What would cause media influence to decline? The only things I can think of are either a miraculous anti-media revival, or widespread censorship laws.
(or do you mean that media just stops pushing feminism?)
Backlash and breakdown, mostly.
It's fair to say I do focus on it a lot, but that's because I think it's a genuine threat to the future. Plus, as I'm boycotting nearly every entertainment company, I have way too much free time.
I think a lot of the people who have the view that I'm wrong are one of three things :
Married and out of the dating scene for over a decade.
Older men who haven't really been near young women and only have experience with 50+ women, not the women they expect us to have kids with.
Stormcucks that will defend women because their ideology requires everything to be the fault of Jews.
But everything is the fault of the jews. They have a stranglehold on media, education, politics, and the law.
You haven't noticed?
Jews didn't subvert white women. It was a mere coincidence that they changed at the time when Jewish "influence" was high.
The link is far more obvious between the fact that women were now able to earn their own living and their lack of care for us. They were only acting nice because they needed our cash.
It's because he's rationalized the motivations and causes of ills we see in society by working backwards towards generalizations (inductive reasoning) that may not necessarily be the exact motivations or causes of those ills, even though the result is the same and his logic is sound. Because his logic is sound and it all "makes sense", he has no need to explore alternatives, so further evidence merely reinforces the "model" or framework of reality.
It is not even surprising that he can make hypotheses that turn out to be correct, when his model is not mutually exclusive with alternative models, and most likely overlaps with reality. I can neither say with 100% certainty that he's wrong, but I have no need to accept his conclusions when other explanations exist. (which would need to be discussed on a case-by-case basis)
tldr: i dunno about all that but maybe he's right about some things
Ahhh...I know a few for goodness sake. And they complain they can't find a guy who's got his shit together. And they usually settle for these guys. It's bad out there but not hopeless.
Not always. There is a group that are aware of then being taken advantage of by such men and will go to the other extreme and seek non-threatening males (I dare not call then men) or goofy/dopey guys and then complain about that. Balance can be elusive. Though I do think that this group of women has potential for a decent man, one who can protect/guide them. They may even grow to love each other.