President Joe Biden will visit Tulsa, Oklahoma, on Tuesday to commemorate one of the bloodiest race massacres in U.S. history.
Again, they are lying even about that.
You want to talk about "bloodiest Race Massacres" you need to have:
a massacre, this wasn't one, it's a genuine race-riot, though battle or still count from the descriptions.
very high causalities - we can only confirm 10 dead whites and 20 some dead blacks. So somewhere around 30 confirmed.
There are estimates that there were hundreds of dead, but there's no evidence, and no mass graves, despite people desperately looking.
I can imagine that it felt like hundreds of people died when thousands of people fled from the multiple rolling gun-battles and the legit hundred or more wounded. But there's no evidence of it.
There have been way worse "Race Massacres", many of them in the Civil War or during Reconstruction. There are a few Indian Massacres, but due to the limited concentrations of Indians & settlers, these tended never to stray past 100 beyond full scale battles like Little Big Horn, Wounded Knee, Nat Turner's rebellion, or the Colifax Massacre. All of which we have better evidence for. And in all of those cases, they are unquestionable massacres involving armed individuals slaughtering either defeated, surrendered, or unarmed belligerents or civilians.
Again, they are lying even about that.
You want to talk about "bloodiest Race Massacres" you need to have:
There are estimates that there were hundreds of dead, but there's no evidence, and no mass graves, despite people desperately looking.
I can imagine that it felt like hundreds of people died when thousands of people fled from the multiple rolling gun-battles and the legit hundred or more wounded. But there's no evidence of it.
There have been way worse "Race Massacres", many of them in the Civil War or during Reconstruction. There are a few Indian Massacres, but due to the limited concentrations of Indians & settlers, these tended never to stray past 100 beyond full scale battles like Little Big Horn, Wounded Knee, Nat Turner's rebellion, or the Colifax Massacre. All of which we have better evidence for. And in all of those cases, they are unquestionable massacres involving armed individuals slaughtering either defeated, surrendered, or unarmed belligerents or civilians.
You mean like the Jamestown massacre? Where Indians killed a quarter of the colonists?
Sure. That's probably one of the biggest I've seen in the continental US.