Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

86
“peer review is now a cartel that blocks new science” peer review is *not* what you think it is. It has been SOLD to you. It has been holding your society’s scientific progress hostage since widely introduced about 50yrs ago. (twitter.com)
posted 5 years ago by SophiesBoyfriend 5 years ago by SophiesBoyfriend +86 / -0
28 comments share
28 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
▲ 5 ▼
– Gizortnik 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

Peer Review isn't necessarily a problem, the issue is that how it's being used is a problem. It's become only about consensus building which is the main complaint here, but that doesn't mean removing peer-review as a system.

Peer-review should involve other people in the field tearing at your research to pick holes in it and find out where you are fucking up.

There is a concern that this could lead to science becoming to establishmentarian, and we have seen that in the past with Quantum Mechanics and Fourier Series'. However, there is also an important point about trying to make sure that established science is not simply overthrown by some new academic or intellectual fad. What we need to fix is Peer-Review promoting intellectual fads instead of maintaining scientific rigor.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– tobeornotto 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

We need to incentivize reproduction.

Peer review puts zealots and activists in positions to rubber stamp conclusions they like and obstruct conclusions they don't. The aggregare effect of this over decades you can observe for yourself.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Gizortnik 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

We also may need to privatize research funding.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy