Blacks are still 13% of the population and holding steady.
12% and declining. Their population numbers are fairly stunted. This is what happens when you abort more children in New York City than you give birth to.
They also caucus with the Hispanics to a large extent.
Not when they live next to each other.
This is the futility of your insane "just outbreed them!" logic. Children cost money. You need good paying jobs for that money, jobs that are going to Rajeesh on the visa program.
Whites are still the vast majority of the population. You could easily outbreed all other ethnic groups in the US if Whites went from 1.2 Children per family, and pushed to 2.5 or 3 Children per family, and pushed the marriage rate up to 60-70%. It really would be that easy based on scale alone.
The problem is White Leftists aren't having children and are destroying the concept of family.
Yes children cost money, but you'll make more money if you marry and have a strong family. Go to work earlier (rather than blowing everything in college) and you'll also develop work experience that will be useful in building a career and having the money to support a family earlier. Increased status as well.
I know there's lots of things that depress white birth rates, they happen to be all the same things that depress black and even native American birth rates. Literally all of them Leftist in orgin.
We're in a breeding war with the entire world because there's no shithole dwellers our politicians wouldn't import. That's not winnable.
Congratulations, the pattern you're noticing is power, not race.
The resulting chaos results in never-ending white flight that disrupts white families and liquidates white wealth in a way that isn't done to anyone else on any matter of scale.
That's just not true. White Flight would effectively help white people by allowing them to transfer their wealth within their homes as financial vehicles into other homes as financial vehicles. When you consider that the children are inhereting the family wealth in those homes and selling them anyway, then using that to put down money on an even more expensive house in a different neighborhood, they're still building wealth.
There really is very little in the way of white families losing wealth in the way of white flight. The housing value collapses after they leave, not really before.
Your larger complaint is about pushing low income housing and public housing development into suburbs, which is still going to generate the same results. There are far too many suburb's for HUD to building public housing to collapse (and they frankly wouldn't want to anyway because their employees live in those same suburbs).
Frankly, what HUD is doing is less about driving down housing prices and more about stimulating white flight from certain areas so that they can maintain voting blocks in different districts by forcibly relocating populations by manipulating public housing.
Your own individualist, materialist world view depresses birth rates among those who adopt it.
My individualism allows men to focus on creating meaning in their lives through building families (something they already want to do), and the focus on building material wealth allows them to save money to build a family with.
Platitude. Do you agree with me that a breeding war is pointless? You're the one advocating for it.
More like placation. I don't think you need a breeding war at all, but I'm trying to alleviate your fear which stems from your racial theory of history. If your whole schtick is demographics = destiny, that's still easy to fix starting with you.
A new mortgage is new debt... Homes don't sell for nearly as much if your neighborhood is going to shit, and not all these whites own homes.
You home will still be worth substantially more than what you bought it at. It's rare to ever see a home sold for a loss in general. But even in terms of purchasing power, the kind of white flight that we are talking about, is still a major net gain for whites.
A new mortgage isn't a new debt, not exactly. The way that things work now especially is that your mortgage debt is actually an investment vehicle itself. You can actually use the sale of one property to basically "cash out" the mortgage on the first property, and then open a new mortgage on a new property with whatever profits you would have made from the sale of the first house. If you stay with the same mortgage company, you can also get a very nice interest rate and improved line of credit.
As a fan of Austrian Economics, I'm not saying I like the scheme, but I understand how the scheme works. The debt won't actually break you, and will be useful in building purchasing power through credit. This is not a loosing proposition if you're smart and pay your bills.
White home owners leaving is what white flight means. They aren't talking about white renters.
It also breaks up communities, the bedrock of strong families. Strong families aren't built from barroom and Tindr hookups, you know.
Wrong, it's the other way around. Strong families are what builds strong communities. Strong communities can't make strong families, they can just offer minimal support to weak ones.
You're a real piece of work to try to spin white flight as beneficial to white people.
What, you think staying is more beneficial?
I trust that leaving was the most beneficial decision for them.
You have to look at this holistically.
I'm looking at it tactically, which is the perspective of the Left.
Your individualism nurtures narcissism, alienation, and consumerism.
Individualism begets responsibility which contradicts all three.
12% and declining. Their population numbers are fairly stunted. This is what happens when you abort more children in New York City than you give birth to.
Not when they live next to each other.
Whites are still the vast majority of the population. You could easily outbreed all other ethnic groups in the US if Whites went from 1.2 Children per family, and pushed to 2.5 or 3 Children per family, and pushed the marriage rate up to 60-70%. It really would be that easy based on scale alone.
The problem is White Leftists aren't having children and are destroying the concept of family.
Yes children cost money, but you'll make more money if you marry and have a strong family. Go to work earlier (rather than blowing everything in college) and you'll also develop work experience that will be useful in building a career and having the money to support a family earlier. Increased status as well.
I know there's lots of things that depress white birth rates, they happen to be all the same things that depress black and even native American birth rates. Literally all of them Leftist in orgin.
They live here and immigrated legally.
Congratulations, the pattern you're noticing is power, not race.
That's just not true. White Flight would effectively help white people by allowing them to transfer their wealth within their homes as financial vehicles into other homes as financial vehicles. When you consider that the children are inhereting the family wealth in those homes and selling them anyway, then using that to put down money on an even more expensive house in a different neighborhood, they're still building wealth.
There really is very little in the way of white families losing wealth in the way of white flight. The housing value collapses after they leave, not really before.
Your larger complaint is about pushing low income housing and public housing development into suburbs, which is still going to generate the same results. There are far too many suburb's for HUD to building public housing to collapse (and they frankly wouldn't want to anyway because their employees live in those same suburbs).
Frankly, what HUD is doing is less about driving down housing prices and more about stimulating white flight from certain areas so that they can maintain voting blocks in different districts by forcibly relocating populations by manipulating public housing.
My individualism allows men to focus on creating meaning in their lives through building families (something they already want to do), and the focus on building material wealth allows them to save money to build a family with.
points fingers at head: "Think, Mark!"
More like placation. I don't think you need a breeding war at all, but I'm trying to alleviate your fear which stems from your racial theory of history. If your whole schtick is demographics = destiny, that's still easy to fix starting with you.
You home will still be worth substantially more than what you bought it at. It's rare to ever see a home sold for a loss in general. But even in terms of purchasing power, the kind of white flight that we are talking about, is still a major net gain for whites.
A new mortgage isn't a new debt, not exactly. The way that things work now especially is that your mortgage debt is actually an investment vehicle itself. You can actually use the sale of one property to basically "cash out" the mortgage on the first property, and then open a new mortgage on a new property with whatever profits you would have made from the sale of the first house. If you stay with the same mortgage company, you can also get a very nice interest rate and improved line of credit.
As a fan of Austrian Economics, I'm not saying I like the scheme, but I understand how the scheme works. The debt won't actually break you, and will be useful in building purchasing power through credit. This is not a loosing proposition if you're smart and pay your bills.
White home owners leaving is what white flight means. They aren't talking about white renters.
Wrong, it's the other way around. Strong families are what builds strong communities. Strong communities can't make strong families, they can just offer minimal support to weak ones.
What, you think staying is more beneficial?
I trust that leaving was the most beneficial decision for them.
I'm looking at it tactically, which is the perspective of the Left.
Individualism begets responsibility which contradicts all three.