I recently attempted to listen to the Dave Chappelle interview on the JRE podcast and, sadly, within the first ten minutes Dave proved that he was still an egregious racist. The essence of the discussion was Dave sucking Ghandis dick despite Ghandis anti-black work in South Africa. He also said that Ghandi was fighting white supremacy by working to liberate India through civil disobedience. These views of course are the only way that an egregious racist can rationalize Ghandis clearly racist actions. Note however how he blames white supremacy not British colonialism, as somehow all white people were evil instead of every country grabbing as much power as possible. Even his own statements contradict “white supremacy” or even racism being the cause of British colonialism. Like he explicitly stated Ghandi was trained as a lawyer in London. Which should immediately raise an eyebrow. How terrible are British “white supremacists” when they are training “brown” people in lucrative and high tier professions that they don’t even offer to their own race first? Next is that Dave admits Ghandi wrote racist legislation in South Africa, but was not racist because he wasn’t white? Apparently getting trained by white people and writing racist legislation for them is A-OK, as long as you yourself are not white. Also, how horrendous are the British white supremacists when they turn over governorship back to the Indian people they trained and invested in? We all know how bloody the American Revolutionary War was.
What makes this worse is this is how history is being taught through crt. No other society can hold blame but the mystical white supremacy. Slavic people spent over 2000 years as slaves and breeding livestock for tan and brown people, but apparently they chose to do so as they were the oppressors of the black, brown, and tan people who brutalized them.
So, most of what the Left says is wrong, but there is something to talk about in regards to English Supremacism eventually turning into White Supremacism, and the Leftists revising everything and reversing the cause and effect.
White Supremacism as a concept has basically only ever existed in America. It's not really even appropriate to apply it to other continents, especially Europe, where despite the racialist right's desires, the concept is still utterly worthless to people who are significantly different.
However, American White Supremacism as a concept does have an origin to a kind of English Supremacist, or really Anglo Supremacist arrogance that you did find in England, and that the English always fucking carried with them through the Empire. The way I see it, the English seemed like they were always huffing their own farts about how great they were, and Anglicanizing was always a moral imperative, no matter how many people you fucking slaughtered. England was simply to pure for slavery, but the Empire had no qualms about it. England was a perfect country, it didn't matter that the Highland Scotts and the Irish were being utterly fucking genocided. Even the Americans, who explicitly claimed their rights as Englishmen, not Britons, were seen as a lesser form of English, frankly not entirely civilized enough to deserve those rights. And although there is officially no English parliament, the British parliament could be mistaken for one (at least until recent decades).
Then all of the sudden the Londoners and English supremacists would be stunned to hear that the Empire had fucking burned another city, or slaughtered another clan, or had done some other unspeakable act of violence, and it created a bit of a political shit storm... and then it was quietly brushed under the rug. Continuing the illusion that the English were just better than everyone, like those savages from France.
This attitude was basically adapted to the Americas because the Americans didn't want to call themselves English because a) they just left, b) being English didn't really do shit for most of them in the previous centuries, c) many weren't English anyway.
This is why, when you see the Left attacking "whiteness", they are often attacking English values represented by things like "The Protestant Work Ethic" and things like that. English values promote liberty and individualism as opposed to collectivism and authoritarianism. Hence why the Communists want to kill it, and associate it with a label they've already poisoned "white".
Thus, all English cultural actions are considered White cultural actions. That's why they can stand there and scream British Imperialism is actually White Supremacy: there is a partial link between Anglo Supremacism and British Imperialism, therefore they can work backwards and say that White Supremacy comes from Anglo Supremacism which is influences British Imperialism which therefore makes it White Supremacy. Or they can just give up and say, "hurr durr, whites benefit thus white supremacy".
However, what's funny is that you could actually argue that White Supremacism is opposed to English values and is Anti-Anglo Supremacism because White Supremacism is more inclusive than Anglo Supremacism. White Supremacism would have to uplift the Scotts, Irish, French, Germans, and Poles as much as they support the English... which Anglo Supremacism would not tolerate.