I explicitly said unjust laws. That has nothing to do with me, that's undeniable fact. Unless you're going to try and argue that shit like "civil forfeiture" or dragging a peaceful religious practitioner away in the middle of the street is "just", then I have some serious concerns about what the fuck you think you're talking about.
You did not specify any standard for what makes a law 'unjust'. Or why it should be your conception of what an 'unjust law' is that they should not enforce. Perhaps if your anarchistic worldview prevails, they'll stop enforcing some of the laws that you do like as 'unjust'.
Like those persecuting black bodies for seizing reparations from local stores.
Of course you need to. If you're saying that police officers should ignore some laws, you need to specify by what standard it should be determined that these laws are to be ignored.
Didn't say that either.
By not specifying a standard, that's exactly what you did.
Nice mind-reading.
No, just logical consequence of what you advocate.
Oof.
You're not getting that it's satire, even though I called looting 'reparations'?
Oh come on, you sound like Antifa.
You did not specify any standard for what makes a law 'unjust'. Or why it should be your conception of what an 'unjust law' is that they should not enforce. Perhaps if your anarchistic worldview prevails, they'll stop enforcing some of the laws that you do like as 'unjust'.
Like those persecuting black bodies for seizing reparations from local stores.
Of course you need to. If you're saying that police officers should ignore some laws, you need to specify by what standard it should be determined that these laws are to be ignored.
By not specifying a standard, that's exactly what you did.
No, just logical consequence of what you advocate.
You're not getting that it's satire, even though I called looting 'reparations'?
That laws that you regard as 'unjust' should be ignored and not enforced.