It is negligible. Whether it's wet or dry or hot or cold all weather conditions are always blamed on climate change. The weather channel freaks out if there's a below average hurricane season (climate change reducing hurricanes), an average hurricane season (climate change causes hurricanes) or an above average hurricane season (climate change is causing more hurricanes), and this is the narrative all the time from all institutions. The reason this is pushed, is so the globo homo elites can cripple the people by depriving them of the only cheap reliable source of energy - fossil fuels (how many times have you heard of goals of reaching "carbon nuetral?". Carbon Dioxide is not harmful to the environment at all. It is like saying water is harmful for fish... Look up the Club of Rome. This all is a bogus hoax and has been for a long time.
Whenever it's too wet or too dry or too hot or too cold it's always blamed on climate change.
That has no bearing on the validity of the original thing.
The reason this is pushed, is so the globo homo elites can cripple the people by depriving them of the only cheap reliable source of energy - fossil fuels
That is certainly a reason why it's exaggerated and there is so much alarmism. It doesn't invalidate the original thing though, same for the virus whose existence you also deny.
This all is a bogus hoax and has been for a long time.
You didn't explain how one determines that someone is a member of 'the wise'.
It is negligible. Whether it's wet or dry or hot or cold all weather conditions are always blamed on climate change. The weather channel freaks out if there's a below average hurricane season (climate change reducing hurricanes), an average hurricane season (climate change causes hurricanes) or an above average hurricane season (climate change is causing more hurricanes), and this is the narrative all the time from all institutions. The reason this is pushed, is so the globo homo elites can cripple the people by depriving them of the only cheap reliable source of energy - fossil fuels (how many times have you heard of goals of reaching "carbon nuetral?". Carbon Dioxide is not harmful to the environment at all. It is like saying water is harmful for fish... Look up the Club of Rome. This all is a bogus hoax and has been for a long time.
That has no bearing on the validity of the original thing.
That is certainly a reason why it's exaggerated and there is so much alarmism. It doesn't invalidate the original thing though, same for the virus whose existence you also deny.
You didn't explain how one determines that someone is a member of 'the wise'.