What made me most skeptical about the AGW/CC narrative is that all the solutions offered were political, and really excellent solutions that work right now, like nuclear power, were actively suppressed by the same "recommendations".
It's a cult. If they actually believed that CC is an existential threat, they would be pushing nuclear power despite their misgivings. France mostly has nuclear power, and it is yet to blow up.
Considering that Three Miles Island killed zero people and Chernobyl was a disaster mostly because of how the Bolsheviks dealt with it, it does not seem to me that pre-1990 nuclear power plants were unsafe either. It's just stratospherically safe, and definitely kills fewer people than coal.
They are perfectly rational. The leaders, that is, I'm not talking about the screeching retards who read the polar bears will melt in two weeks unless we stop using plastic straws. They're rational, the problem is that their goal is complete obliteration of advanced civilization and unprecedented genocide. They're sociopaths who demand to be rulers, even if all they have to rule is a pile of ash.
It's a cult. If they actually believed that CC is an existential threat, they would be pushing nuclear power despite their misgivings. France mostly has nuclear power, and it is yet to blow up.
Considering that Three Miles Island killed zero people and Chernobyl was a disaster mostly because of how the Bolsheviks dealt with it, it does not seem to me that pre-1990 nuclear power plants were unsafe either. It's just stratospherically safe, and definitely kills fewer people than coal.
You're assuming they're rational.
They are perfectly rational. The leaders, that is, I'm not talking about the screeching retards who read the polar bears will melt in two weeks unless we stop using plastic straws. They're rational, the problem is that their goal is complete obliteration of advanced civilization and unprecedented genocide. They're sociopaths who demand to be rulers, even if all they have to rule is a pile of ash.