First and foremost we must acknowledge that Asians in America population had nearly doubled in the past 20 years, this however is still only 18.9 million Americans. What is noticeable however is that Asians make up 60% of the world population and has quadrupled in size over the course of the 20th and current century to the tune of 4.4 billion people as of 2016. When we look at how race is portrayed in America the only rational explanation is that the world racial population is being pandered to over the population percentage in America. This means that minorities in America have consistently been pandered to based off of world demographics. Asians and blacks worldwide have been the largest growing populations despite supposed racism and being underdeveloped regions. In 1999 the UN predicted that 98% of population growth would occur in underdeveloped countries mainly in Asia and Africa. 'The future of human population growth has been determined, and is being determined, in the world's poorer nations,'. This is not a naturally occurring growth but one that has been achieved through manipulation, every developed country saw massive population surges in the first half of the 20th century until major changes in personal wealth caused the average American family to shrink while social programs enabled mass breeding from immigrants who even in the poorest state by American standards live far better than their racial and cultural counterparts abroad. This is also supported by the fact that black people today in America make less than they did in 2000. This shows that state dependency and “DEI” is actually more harmful to black Americans. On the other end of the spectrum Asian Americans now hold 30% more average income than the average white family. This has occurred despite the “catastrophic rise” in Asian hate crimes. These numbers point to Americans being beholden to Chinas whims, as China has begun its economic subjugation of Africa and Asia. The Muslim takeover of Europe is based off of the same global numbers where Muslims are being pandered to due to their global numbers surpassing the native Europeans. Understanding that corporations and ‘white’ countries governments have consistently caused these mass inflations of foreign populations while also advocating for the replacement of their majority populations. The push for physical diversity is not to create a more fair and equitable society but to make a permanent upper and lower class caste system. The BLM movement and every black movement during the 21st century is not to help advance black people, but to denigrate them into willingly being the bottom castes in order to “save” them from Western Society which helped raise them to the highest economic value ever achieved by blacks worldwide.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
That makes little sense. I'd say that it's the other way around. Where I live, I see 50% blacks, barely exaggerating, in everything e.g. advertisements, when the black population is something like 1%. Same in Britain, where there is quite a small black population which is either very successful or involved in knife-crime. But they get an outsized importance because of poison flowing over from the other side of the Atlantic.
While I do believe that the DIE cult and state dependency are harmful to blacks, these statistics do not prove that. It's a post hoc, ergo propter hoc. In theory, they could have been positive or neutral, with some other cause creating the downturn.
Somehow, the Chinese don't need to pander to anyone.
I think you get this right, but not in the way you think. They want a multicolor elite that believes in exactly the same thing and spits on the working-class, which is the permanent lower caste. E.g. affirmative action helps blacks who are already well-off, while hurting whites and Asians who are working class.
Blacks are the second highest world population which fits in line with everything I stated, they are going to become the permanent underclass. The statistics show that social programs developed by Democrats harm black Americans in the long run, this is neither a new no foreign concept. Black Americans lost a third of their net worth from the subprime mortgage crisis also known as the Clinton/Greenspan initiative to stop redlining the decade before. Affirmative action helped white women period. Stopping background checks in blue states led to less blacks being hired than in red states. The list goes on endlessly.
Exactly. Every single diversity initiative just happened to include women, "stopping Asian hate" is going to be the same shit. They hide behind different people every time, but they always end up coming out on top, with whoever they used to get there being the target of everyone's anger.
Whether they do or not, your argument didn't.
Affirmative action helps middle/upper-class members of Oppressioned classes, while hurting lower/working-class members of all classes.