Earlier this month, a provincial court ruled that he [Coates] will not be allowed to challenge the constitutional validity of Alberta’s Public Health Act and that the government does not have to provide scientific evidence justifying the public health order.
What in the good God damned fuck is the point of a constitution if you're not allowed to argue that a law is unconstitutional.
I mean, I get that Canada is going full authoritarian and their constitution is now worth less than a roll of pre-lockdown toilet paper, but just get rid of the facade. What's the point of even pretending you care about the constitution at this point?
Because if you violate the Constitution while leaving it in place, normies will pretend everything is okay and even condemn anyone who fights back. If you actually withdraw the Constitution, then normies will have to face the unpleasant reality that they are cowards who won't stand up for principle.
What in the good God damned fuck is the point of a constitution if you're not allowed to argue that a law is unconstitutional.
I mean, I get that Canada is going full authoritarian and their constitution is now worth less than a roll of pre-lockdown toilet paper, but just get rid of the facade. What's the point of even pretending you care about the constitution at this point?
Because if you violate the Constitution while leaving it in place, normies will pretend everything is okay and even condemn anyone who fights back. If you actually withdraw the Constitution, then normies will have to face the unpleasant reality that they are cowards who won't stand up for principle.
Trust the Soyence.
That is a terrifying precedent...