Is it just me or is this a side effect that literally no one should care about? You're inconvenienced, so what?
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
So you don't think it's odd that yet again an investigation happens because women most affected?
And there were investigations over deaths. You just think that there shouldn't be any when wahmen die, because you probably cheer the death of "Nazis" who want to kill you.
No, there weren't.
AstraZeneca - Nothing until women got affected.
Johnson and Johnson - Nothing until a woman died.
Pfizer - Nothing until women are affected.
It's a joke.
Here you are, on April 6, claiming that AZ is "no longer safe" because there was an investigation after wahmen died: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12i48dBitP/astrazeneca-no-longer-safebecaus/c/
Of course, there were investigations when men were affected. Here's an article from March 11, a full month before you claimed that an investigation proved that it's considered "no longer safe". https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-prac-investigating-cases-thromboembolic-events-vaccines-benefits
By the way, you bet on that thread that women would be exempted from taking AZ: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12i48dBitP/x/c/4DzdtJMgPWZ
Once again, you were wrong, just like you were wrong that the name of the female cop in MN would not be published, just like you were wrong that she would not be charged, just like you were wrong when you said the charges would be 'quietly dropped', just like you were wrong when you said Murkowski and Collins would vote for Trump's first impeachment.
I can go on and on, because you have a looooong record. But you get the picture. You'd be more right if you based your predictions on chance.